$EH.US$ Where is this going to drop?

疯涨的韭菜 OP 70518060 :

疯涨的韭菜 OP 70518060 : It's okay if there aren't many, forget to leave them all out

70227310 : Judging from the situation, the Guangzhou government still has to take action; the stock price can go up once you invest in shares

70227310 : According to the news, their business is already underway, so I think the government's entry into the bureau can provide some help for them to develop rapidly when they lack capital, second, strengthen their positive views on EHang, and third, share a share of the pie from enterprise development

70227310 : I think Ehang can be one of China's cultural exports to the outside world like the future, and this is what China needs most now

麦菲大王 70227310 : What can eh output? As a flight attendant aircraft, it has a short battery life and few passengers. The battery life is still short when it comes to firefighting. The amount of water stored is too much, the battery life is even shorter, and the hover time is not enough when the fire is too big. The price is so high, wouldn't it be nice to buy a helicopter? Wouldn't it be nice to use a dji for these small terrain observation tasks?

70227310 : Businesses I can think of include sightseeing drones, light exhibitions, fixed-point flights, rescue missions, etc.
Note that this is unmanned operation, which saves the biggest cost. Of course, all of this can only be done if you have real technical skills; you can do your own homework

麦菲大王 70518060 : The battery problem is inherently a big problem. There are no good solutions to car battery problems, so just paint a big cake and talk about flying. Cars need to consider battery weight issues on the ground; aircraft are even more necessary. The layout of hydrogen energy supply and research and development are also not as simple as buying and selling.

70227310 : Don't you want money for labor costs?
Do you think it's okay to control this kind of aircraft without money then there's nothing I can do
As for machines not worth money, you think 2 million isn't worth it, then we can stop discussing this issue; we don't even have values on one channel

麦菲大王 70227310 : Don't worry about talking about concepts, do your homework yourself. The new EH 216 also only seats two people, has a battery life of about ten minutes, and is charged for at least an hour. How can I complete sightseeing missions and rescue them. How many hours does commercial tourism require to be prepared to meet the flow of visitors; the cost is simply outrageously high. In terms of rescue, EH currently doesn't have enough space at all. Driverless driving on the ground is difficult because there are so many sudden situations to deal with. Being in the air is currently not a difficult point; there are countless companies that can do it.

70227310 : The average employee has to pay at least 5,000 yuan. Plus taxes, insurance, and pensions, you really don't need money to support someone
And how much does it cost to be an aircraft operator to get tested? For beginners, 260,000 information comes from Baidu, so how much does it cost to support an operator
And this is an ongoing expense
As long as this company actually has its technology, I'm not worried at all
Will continue to increase holdings

70227310 麦菲大王 : It's usually not enough to pay a thousand or two hundred yuan to browse this thing at a time; a light show costs ten thousand won't be enough; it's okay to rescue high-rise buildings to lock in crowds and check advertisements on a regular basis
Are you underestimating Chinese consumption

70227310 : Did you think it was two million cheaper at first, and now you're starting to say the cost is high?
When an average aircraft flies 5 times a day, 365 days a year, it can return more than 910,000
Do you think it's expensive

70227310 70227310 : If you visit its attractions for 500 yuan once, you can pay back 910,000 yuan a year

麦菲大王 70227310 : I never said 2 million was cheap. If you've done your homework, you should know that drones use unmanned aerial vehicles for light shows. There are many domestic companies in this field, and there aren't many opportunities to perform. Basically, it's government funding; the non-manned drone DJI is the leader. Moreover, advertisement delivery is now far more efficient than drone delivery under big data on the Internet. Also, for sightseeing at tourist attractions, the cost of existing traditional helicopters is far lower than EH even when hiring a pilot. The price of a traditional helicopter is similar to the EH 216, and it can carry 4-5 passengers at a time. The daily passenger capacity can be ten or twenty times that of an EH drone, or even higher. Also, rescuing people in high-rise buildings is the same. The number of passengers carried is small, the hover time is short, and there are no existing helicopters that are efficient.

70227310 : I'm too lazy to carry it. As far as the electric cars you mentioned are all garbage fuel trucks, wouldn't it be better to just waste time and ask someone to drive for autonomous driving
Why is the government optimistic about this? Go to Baidu yourself

麦菲大王 70227310 : You know your leverage too. Trams are a mass market. They can effectively reduce carbon emissions and use renewable energy. How big is the EH market. It's been a few years since 184 was developed. Have they been commercialized? In addition to showing videos online, videos are also displayed. Moreover, this market is simply not on the same level for environmental protection and energy use as compared to electric cars. When the battery quality of the key electric vehicle is improved and its own weight increases, it is still possible to maintain an effective increase in mileage; charging a drone simply cannot be done. In the early stages, electric cars can carry as much passenger capacity as fuel trucks, and can also reach a mileage of several hundred kilometers. Can EH 184 and 216 reach the battery life, speed, and passenger capacity of any passenger helicopter? Why can't it do 416, 616? Also, speaking of charging, the 216 now uses a 17kw battery, and the fastest way to charge a 380v is 1 hour. If you compare the charging speed of a tram, you know what kind of garbage technology eh this is. Also, I mentioned that driverless driving is a good technology, but achieving driverless driving in the air is far simpler than driverless driving on the ground. After all, there are far fewer accidents in the air than on the ground. This is not a technological breakthrough at all; many commercial express delivery drones can already be deployed point-to-point. This field is on the cusp of battery technology only after breakthroughs in battery technology. If you wait for breakthroughs in battery technology, DJI will enter this market, and it will also hit EH.

韭菜小2 : cai

一股拉面 : It will slowly turn into something between $3-10 for gross stocks. This is how Apple first came out. It would take 10-20 years for one company to actually dominate the market.