Didi has come to an end in the US...
$DiDi Global (Delisted)(DIDI.US$ It's strange that other people say that there's nothing like Didi's current situation... Didi's problem now is that it discloses internal information and stops updating (removal). It's very likely that it won't go out of business in the future, and there's still a possibility that the business will grow, but even if it's not taken over by others, information certainly won't be allowed to be disclosed. If information isn't disclosed, can the US allow it? When the time comes, it will be the result of a forced suspension and removal from the shelves in the US...
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
70132250 : The apps have all been removed, which means that the app that was already installed by the old user cannot be updated or maintained in any way. Bugs cannot be fixed, and how long can it last! Also, once the phone is replaced, it is impossible for the new phone to register to download this app; it's just like giving Didi some time to slowly die
70132250 : Only US retail investors don't buy Didi. No Americans care about its life or death. To be precise, China's securities are just not bought by American retail investors. They are all forced to drive out all of the Chinese companies and prevent them from going public in the US to steal money
牛牛叫妞妞去扭扭 OP 70132250 : In my opinion, “capital is all profit-seeking”. There are no stocks that retail investors don't want; it just depends on whether there are any benefits to be obtained; the benefits are not big enough. The only people who really want to get rid of China Securities are those managers from beautiful countries. So after all, it depends on how Chinese enterprises operate and how they respond. As for this incident, did Didi actually sell the country, or did it just want to “act in accordance with the law”, we can still watch and eat melons...
70132250 牛牛叫妞妞去扭扭 OP : It's because the family is unique, the more they do it, the more they do it, and there are too many complaints. You need to know: a single family is not allowed domestically; they monopolize the market; they won't be allowed in any country
70132250 牛牛叫妞妞去扭扭 OP : Most importantly, many online car-hailing software can be used, Didi's market share can be completely replaced, and its market share can also be divided by other peers, and Didi has been boycotted by many drivers. The up to 30% rebate has already made drivers very dissatisfied. Those drivers directly handed us business cards and said they would directly ask him to hail a car, which is 15% cheaper than going through Didi to buy a ride-hailing service (let's give half of the 30% rebate to passengers)! The most important point: Didi, which accounts for 90% of the market, has been in business for 9 years. Why is it losing tens of billions of dollars every year, and where has all the money gone? Some shareholders say that Didi's senior management has run out of money, which is questionable
牛牛叫妞妞去扭扭 OP 70132250 : Hello big brother... no offense, just wanted to confirm, have you ever lived in the country?
70132250 牛牛叫妞妞去扭扭 OP : I've lived in many places, especially at home. I'm not used to Tencent building momentum for new shares in Didi, which holds its own shares. At all, moomoo never mentioned that Didi has been investigated by the national cyber security in the past. The problems that existed before going public clearly hurt your individual investors. You have the right to protect your rights and interests; even more, you should prosecute Didi for heavy losses.
牛牛叫妞妞去扭扭 OP 70132250 : I am very happy to talk to you and thank you so much for your comments. Seeing this response from you further confirms what I just thought. Some of your thoughts may not be close to the reality at home. Maybe you've lived at home... but obviously, your mind isn't understanding... otherwise you won't say anything you don't get used to, defend your rights, or prosecute![[undefined]](https://static.moomoo.com/nnq/emoji/static/image/default/default-black.png?imageMogr2/thumbnail/36x36 "undefined")
70132250 牛牛叫妞妞去扭扭 OP : Since it is listed on the US stock market, all retail investors can file lawsuits against Didi in accordance with US law. Did he disclose in the prospectus that Didi has always been investigated by national cybersecurity? This isn't something that only appeared after it went public! The massive sell-off of Didi over the next week is a no-brainer. Being shorted by the shorting agency is not something that can be overcome by retail investors with a few small amounts of money. There must be quite a few retail investors who have suffered losses. Defending their rights is one option! Moreover, Didi is not irreplaceable. It has a monopoly, sells user data, and cuts the chauffeur's revenue. Now everyone is outraged. Many platforms have seen many people say to uninstall it!
A district app that says it has a market value of 100 billion dollars is almost laughable. Now the one that sells milk tea domestically can go on the market, the one that sells mustard is also on the market, the one that delivers takeout is also on the market, and online car-hailing is also on the market. I really can't understand where it can be worth what market value of 100 billion dollars here
心平气和的好韭菜 70132250 : So isn't Facebook just an app?
View more comments...