Although they bear a huge financial burden, Chinese parents reacted differently to the new policy. Some said they support the policy, as they hope their children could take a breather from the heavy daily load of homework.
But a Beijing-based mother of two children told the Global Times that demand isn't going away. "I will still sign up for the courses for my children, because if they don't take the courses, we will be left behind."
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only.
Read more
来吧牛牛
:
I don't think killing educational institutions will solve the problem. The answer should be to universalize higher education. If you want to encourage childbearing, make sure your eldest can go to 211, your junior can go to 985, and if you have 4 children, the whole family will be at Peking University in Tsinghua, which is simpler, more direct and effective. If Tsinghua isn't big enough, open a few more
blue moons
:
You should give birth to 1 million babies, give birth to 2 million, give birth to 3 babies 4 million, and give 4 children a direct reward of 5 million. This is the key to solving the fertility problem! It's a nonsense about people's extracurricular tutoring agencies; it's not a malformed social model where there is a market only when there is demand.
70132250
来吧牛牛
:
When you try raising 3 babies yourself, you know how difficult it is. It's not a question of money at all. Education is originally where parents have the greatest responsibility. Children are not robots, they don't enter a code, and they just act in a step-by-step manner. In fact, there are many annoying things. Remedial classes don't count as anything
来吧牛牛
70132250
:
Yes, it has nothing to do with educational institutions. Now I'd rather send my kids to an educational institution; sometimes it just saves my life. After all, educational institutions are for-profit institutions. Obviously, they pay more attention to cultivating children's interests than schools, and strive to satisfy both parents and children.
Following the introduction of China's groundbreaking DeepSeek technology, Wall Street giants have revised their investment outlooks for the Chinese market.
103047939 : short now
来吧牛牛 : I don't think killing educational institutions will solve the problem. The answer should be to universalize higher education. If you want to encourage childbearing, make sure your eldest can go to 211, your junior can go to 985, and if you have 4 children, the whole family will be at Peking University in Tsinghua, which is simpler, more direct and effective. If Tsinghua isn't big enough, open a few more
blue moons : You should give birth to 1 million babies, give birth to 2 million, give birth to 3 babies 4 million, and give 4 children a direct reward of 5 million. This is the key to solving the fertility problem! It's a nonsense about people's extracurricular tutoring agencies; it's not a malformed social model where there is a market only when there is demand.
70132250 来吧牛牛 : When you try raising 3 babies yourself, you know how difficult it is. It's not a question of money at all. Education is originally where parents have the greatest responsibility. Children are not robots, they don't enter a code, and they just act in a step-by-step manner. In fact, there are many annoying things. Remedial classes don't count as anything
来吧牛牛 70132250 : Yes, it has nothing to do with educational institutions. Now I'd rather send my kids to an educational institution; sometimes it just saves my life. After all, educational institutions are for-profit institutions. Obviously, they pay more attention to cultivating children's interests than schools, and strive to satisfy both parents and children.