Tech stocks are too expensive. No cheap stocks in the market!
The tech sector is definitely the winner since the pandemic. $Apple (AAPL.US)$ surged 82% in 2020 and has gained 10% in 2021. $NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$ more than doubled itself in 2020 and has advanced 68% in 2021.
However, I think these tech stocks are already too expensive. Well, I'm sure tech companies are the future. But it's not good timing to buy tech stocks. Everything is so expensive!![]()
![]()
I have no idea what I could buy.
$Tesla (TSLA.US)$ $Alphabet-A (GOOGL.US)$ $Amazon (AMZN.US)$
However, I think these tech stocks are already too expensive. Well, I'm sure tech companies are the future. But it's not good timing to buy tech stocks. Everything is so expensive!
$Tesla (TSLA.US)$ $Alphabet-A (GOOGL.US)$ $Amazon (AMZN.US)$
![Tech stocks are too expensive. No cheap stocks in the market!](https://ussnsimg.moomoo.com/2043725163092565420.jpg/bigmoo)
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
金融圈搬砖女工 : I don’t for sure…. But BofA lifted NVidia’s target price today. I guess that means something good right?$NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$
KongWeePeh : This stock in shorting spree. I am waiting for 126.
cheez_lit : Technology stocks are good but expensive, and cheap stocks are too risky
Melodidi : SPFR! 3d printer for Space X!
10652025 : hey, buy $Micron Technology (MU.US)$ then. Looks good
娃娃娃娃 :![undefined [undefined]](https://static.moomoo.com/nnq/emoji/static/image/default/default-black.png?imageMogr2/thumbnail/36x36)
Mahendra :![undefined [undefined]](https://static.moomoo.com/nnq/emoji/static/image/default/default-black.png?imageMogr2/thumbnail/36x36)
HunterSparks : For $NVIDIA(NVDA.US)$ to go 126.I guess the Nasdaq have to crash to 12K at least.It is one of those stocks you will own for a long tome .We will lucky to see $160 for any retracement.
TCSOUTH : SDC is a great buy
Coconut777 :![smiley 😃](https://static.moomoo.com/nnq/emoji/static/image/img-apple-64/1f603.png)
View more comments...