Per Bloomberg, $Tesla (TSLA.US)$ still way underowned by ins...
Per Bloomberg, $Tesla(TSLA.US$ still way underowned by institutions vs other megacaps.
% shares held by institutions:
- $Apple(AAPL.US$ 62%
- $Microsoft(MSFT.US$ 75%
- $Alphabet-A(GOOGL.US$ 85%
- $Amazon(AMZN.US$ 71%
- $Tesla(TSLA.US$ 44%
- $NVIDIA(NVDA.US$ 70%
- $Meta Platforms(META.US$ 80%
Several reasons: Weak board, key man risk, capital allocation, high valuation, CEO time split
% shares held by institutions:
- $Apple(AAPL.US$ 62%
- $Microsoft(MSFT.US$ 75%
- $Alphabet-A(GOOGL.US$ 85%
- $Amazon(AMZN.US$ 71%
- $Tesla(TSLA.US$ 44%
- $NVIDIA(NVDA.US$ 70%
- $Meta Platforms(META.US$ 80%
Several reasons: Weak board, key man risk, capital allocation, high valuation, CEO time split
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
TeslaSmurf : YES, but the main reason is not the one cited by Bloomberg; it’s the fact that TSLA has not been rated as an “INVEST GRADE” company by S&P which is absurd, BUT it may change quite soon, as soon as we get the Q3 numbers and as soon as the Twitter “drama” gets a clear solution.
). Volatility is money 
Just reaching the average % of institutional investment would mean a + 50-75% investment. In other terms, a huge rise in the stock price, then a significant decrease in volatility (which I’m not so happy about
Lionnell : heading to 960, I will short from there