She is pictured above interviewing Musk at the MMA Global POSSIBLE conference. The big topics in their chat were free speech and protection for advertisers on Twitter. After the interview, she posted on LinkedIn in praise of Twitter. From after the interview, her tango with Musk about the CEO job began. She had already prior told friends that she was interested in the job.
duk3 : I am discouraged by her affiliation with the World Economic Forum, and her focus on generating advert revenue. In the end, it was creating a "safe space" echo chamber at Twitter, in an effort to woo advertisers and investors, that caused their anti-free speech stance. Musk apparently bought the company private on moral grounds, because that trend disturbed him. I am concerned that, in her effort to entice advertisers, she will allow the platform to become heavily censored again so that advertisers will not have to see content that "hurts their feelings." At least, that is my opinion.
AngelBull duk3 : Elon Musk spent 43 billion on moral ground? Freedom of speech is by product, he wants to monetize Twitter, which is why he hired her to do the job.
72734102 : Agreed! Concerns with her ties to NBC and WEF! Keep her away From ALL tech operations to be used! Still believe Elon has some BAD actors with goals of the Old Anti Free speech agenda! I’m sure he is setting traps to ensnare these Bad Actors pretending to be on board with Elons objectives! Go Elon you are a world class Hero