政治情勢の鍵を握る「国民民主党」は、金融所得課税の強化を推進のスタンス！
In the House of Representatives election, the ruling coalition fell below the majority, remaining at 215 seats. In response to the shortfall of 18 seats needed to secure a majority, cooperation with the Constitutional Democratic Party and the Innovation Party is being explored. In this election, the Constitutional Democratic Party significantly increased its number of seats from 7 to 28, raising expectations for expansionary fiscal policies. As a result, there is a particular focus on the movements of the Constitutional Democratic Party. However, the formation of a coalition government has many uncertainties, and the possibility of a minority cabinet still remains.
The Kibou no To party aims to correct income disparities and revive the middle class, advocating for strengthening taxation on the financial income of the wealthy and supporting asset formation for ordinary households.
National Democratic Party's「The policy to achieve an economy where wages and pensions increase is aimed at resolving income disparities and creating an economic virtuous cycle. Through measures such as expanding the tax-exempt framework of NISA, the intention is to reduce the financial burden on households while building a sustainable fiscal foundation.
National Democratic Party's「The policy to achieve an economy where wages and pensions increase is aimed at resolving income disparities and creating an economic virtuous cycle. Through measures such as expanding the tax-exempt framework of NISA, the intention is to reduce the financial burden on households while building a sustainable fiscal foundation.
The background of this policy is,Responding to the issue known as the "0.1 billion yen barrier", where the income tax burden decreases sharply among high-income earners, plays an important role in correcting income disparities.and is expected to be a vital measure in correcting income disparities.
While discussions continue on the impact on the financial market, measures to alleviate the burden on the middle class while enhancing fiscal sustainability will continue to be a focus. HereLet's keep an eye on the latest trends in financial income taxation that are being discussed among market participants!
● Policies to achieve an economy where salaries and pensions rise
Source: National Democratic Party (Policy Specifics 1)
Various parties' stances on taxing financial income
Source: Keizai Doyukai, a public interest corporation
Disclaimer: Moomoo Technologies Inc. is providing this content for information and educational use only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
氷室の節供図 : There wasn't any party opposing the strengthening of taxation on financial income, right? Some members of the Liberal Democratic Party are against it, and the Japan Conservative Party only briefly mentioned it in the past.
迷人 : Many parties are eager to impose financial taxes, but if that happens, not only will home loans increase, but the number of people making profits from investments such as stocks will decrease even further. On the contrary, if we do not implement financial taxes like consumption tax reductions, the situation will only worsen for Japan's economy.
181078766 : I wonder if you know what happened when Ishiba mentioned taxing financial income? In the first place, Japan is a heavily taxed country where 70% of earnings are taken away in taxes, and on top of that, the tax rate on bitcoin, which originated in Japan, is already exorbitant, causing many wealthy individuals to leave overseas, trying to collect enormous taxes from ordinary citizens who are not wealthy. In the first place, investors can operate anywhere they want. It is those who want to cling to power in Japan who mention defense tax hikes and financial income taxes, but we must not forget that the income of our own members of parliament is top class globally, right? Also, the take-home pay of Japanese people is not even in the G20, you know? In other words, members of parliament are not working at all. Speaking of the average take-home pay of Japanese people, the compensation for parliament members is already quite high at 7.5 million. And yet, how much are they actually receiving, earning tens of millions?!
ロンリーローリー 181078766 : Japan's take-home pay is the lowest in the G20, but Japan's cost of living (inflation rate) ranks 187th globally, not as high as the inflation rate in America. Would you be satisfied if both take-home pay and inflation rates surged?
181078766 ロンリーローリー : Talking about inflation rates, the highest tax rate in the USA used to be the same as before. Since then, it has been increased, but I don't want to pay that much in taxes. Even though Japanese people are paying heavy taxes without any real benefits, you still want to pay high taxes. Well, it's impossible for me. I'm already struggling to make ends meet. And yet, there is talk of further tax increases. Do you know that the Finance Truth Sect is using tax money to repay debts without going through the parliament? Even though Japanese people are already suffering from financial difficulties. Do you not know what happened with the elections despite the low voter turnout for the Liberal Democratic and Komeito parties?
迷人 ロンリーローリー : There is no satisfaction, so they create secret funds, commit tax evasion, and the Liberal Democratic Party and the Innovation Party revise the Political Funds Control Law to make tax evasion easier, with a current tax rate of 20.315%. Despite the fact that Liberal Democratic Party members evade taxes without paying, they can run for elections without any penalties such as arrest, taxation, or collection that other ordinary citizens face, which makes no sense. It's like thieves creating laws for thieves. We ask the lawyers of civic organizations for help. When citizens commit tax evasion, there are penalties, but when it comes to members of parliament, there are no penalties, and any modifications are treated as if nothing happened, which is discrimination from the lower class citizens' perspective and not democracy but rather favoritism. Please don't give up on prosecution and allow for lawsuits if prosecution doesn't progress, please make requests to the courts like the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office. If you gather votes nationwide asking to punish corrupt members of the parliament, both the prosecution and judges will have no choice but to take action.
迷人 :
Please help spread this to reach the lawyers of the civic organization
The fact that thieves create laws for thieves is a violation of the Japanese Constitution.
Lawyers from civic organizations, please.
While citizens face penalties for tax evasion, there seems to be no consequences or penalties for members of the parliament who revise laws as if nothing happened. This treatment appears discriminatory to ordinary citizens and is not democratic but rather oligarchic.
Please do not give up even if no indictment is issued, please proceed with filing a lawsuit.
If the Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office does not take action, please apply to the court.
If a nationwide petition demanding punishment for corrupt parliamentarians is gathered, the prosecution and judges will have no choice but to act.
It is absurd that entertainers are not let off the hook with an 'I didn't know' excuse, yet parliamentarians can get away with claiming ignorance.
初音ミク0139 : Is it just money and rules that they can mess with? Is there no law to protect the people? Does it apply to everyone?
yamapeee : It's strange to limit it to finance. If you want to increase taxes, you should first consider changing the tax rate for fixed assets above a certain price and switching from real estate acquisition tax to real estate transfer tax.
181078766 迷人 : In addition, the remuneration of Japanese parliamentarians is said to be among the top in the world, with the remuneration of parliamentarians in the United Kingdom, France, and the USA being around 14 million. Applying this to about 1.5 times the national average income, the remuneration of Japanese parliamentarians becomes around 7.5 million. Well, that's because they sleep in parliament, don't work, evade taxes, hold parties behind the scenes or in public, enrich themselves, and some former chairman said there is a kickback of a few percent if they provide financial assistance with ODA. I wonder how much money ended up in the pockets of those who distributed tens of trillions of yen. Well, that's why I think they get a clear victory right after the vote count, even though it's so unpopular. After all, it's a scattergun approach.