$CrowdStrike (CRWD.US)$ seems like it was intentionally done...
$CrowdStrike(CRWD.US$ seems like it was intentionally done for Microsoft to short crowdstrike shares like what bill tried to do with Tesla. The security and procedures of Microsoft is very robust to allow such a mistake to happen. Could be for 3 reasons I can think of. To cover Tesla short failure, to buy more farmland or to donate manipulated fraudulent money for a not so good political female candidate to compete with whom most ppl want only to cause mayhem with investors money taken from here.
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
Ken Griffin Charity : What do the security and procedures of Microsoft have anything to do with Crowdstrike?
Shootingstar OP Ken Griffin Charity : Mandatory requirement for contracts to gov and essential agencies using their system dictates this requirement. Else why are their license so costly to gov firms and companies if they cannot even meet this basic requirement to have a reliable operating system?
Ken Griffin Charity Shootingstar OP : You’re not making any sense. The bug was caused by a single channel file. Crowdstrike operates on the kernel level because the falcon agent is an EDR solution. This has nothing to do with contracts whatsoever.
Shootingstar OP Ken Griffin Charity : Are you saying crowdstrike has nothing to do with Microsoft then? If it was meant to run on windows they are linked to me regardless of any application level
Ken Griffin Charity Shootingstar OP : What in any of my words gave that impression? You talk about Microsoft “security and procedures” when any operating system can similarly fail if tampered with on a kernel level.
Shootingstar OP Ken Griffin Charity : Massive blue screens caused by a products openess to be exploited knowingly then is still mircrosoft fault to blame