English Lesson - Lander vs Rover

A lander is equipped with much more capabilities to collect samples and analyze them as they're generally bigger. Most landers have many legs because it gives the best chance of stability during a landing. A lander, will not move after landing, which is why landing it at the best spot possible is seen as more important, which it did. The landing zone is within 2km of its identified area and the lander is generally thought to have landed in the desired zone by NASA scientists. Sometimes a lander can even launch a Rover, but this launch has no rovers involved.

Rovers on the other hand, has limited abilities but are mobile. They are REQUIRED to not tip over as that will mean the end. Ever had a remote toy car flip over? Yeah, imagine that car flipped over hundreds of thousands of kilometers away on the moon. A Rover's usefulness is only if it can move, a lander doesn't need mobility.

This is why the current crash of the stock makes no sense and can just be seen as shorts and market manipulators trying to con the massive number of normal retailers such as ourselves and make us all lose money, because they know this lunar landing is closely followed by a large number of normal people. All the negative news you're reading and seeing have been paid and sponsored by these MM. They want retail investors to sell off and lose their hard earned money. That's what the wall street wolves do.