NVDA
NVIDIA
-- 140.110 RGTI
Rigetti Computing
-- 10.0400 TSLA
Tesla
-- 394.940 IONQ
IonQ Inc
-- 30.250 AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
-- 121.840 If you think optimistically, there is a possibility that FSD will account for tens of billion dollars of sales per year (even more revenue can be expected when considering Dojo licensing and FSD sales to other OEMs).
181338057犬心久美子 : I don't think Elon Musk is looking only at EVs. He's at the center now, but I think his prospects and ambitions are immeasurable.
181557688 : What Tesla, which has become an AI company rather than EV cars, should do is sell fully autonomous vehicles. Once this is achieved, the past high will well be exceeded
sabuzero : It seems that you are truly taking what Elon is saying, but don't you understand that complete autonomous driving is impossible? I don't think there's any reason why a car running a machine won't cause an accident even if an accident occurs even when an operation is moved by human will. It's impossible.
Surimi : Well, accidents will happen even with autonomous driving. But I think it's certain that the accident rate for autonomous driving will be <the accident rate for human drivers. There is also an economic need for labor saving in the transportation industry, so I don't think the trend of autonomous driving will stop. The problem is that it is uncertain how long it will take until it is realized.
sabuzero Surimi : If you're monitoring human data, the accident rate is the same, isn't it? But can you do it while you're still alive? I don't think it will be possible forever.
181557688 sabuzero : I think it's accurate because machines move without humans moving...
sabuzero 181557688 : What I'm studying is human data, so I think the accident rate is the same as humans.
There will be no further results.
If only we could do the same thing as humans without making a difference.
Like a t-shirt folding slave somewhere.
I'm not mistaken?
181557688 : Do you think the accuracy of cutting udon by hand is the same as cutting udon with a machine? Am I misunderstanding something? Is the accident rate the same? no way. explode
exera : I think the difference between humans and machines is due to emotional blurring. People are full of emotions, hesitation habits, judgment speed, etc., but since machines faithfully execute basically determined rules and algorithms, there is probably little variation in output. Naturally, there may be times when errors that don't match reality occur, but I think there are fewer mistakes than humans.
For example, if you speed up and accelerate when it changes from a green light to a yellow light, you can still cross the intersection before it turns red! Or, if you overtake the car in front of you, you'll be able to pass through the intersection before the traffic light changes! I think there are many drivers who think that, but machines don't have that kind of feeling; rather, since the signal seems to change, I think it's safer to slow down little by little rather than accelerate.
This is a cross section called an intersection, but if all cars drive autonomously and stop entering an unreasonable intersection, the number of intersection accidents will decrease, and I think the number of accidents that will happen again will also decrease.