ひろ0723 commented on a stock · Jan 1 14:07

I don't really understand the world of quantum, but (*´-`)

$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ Honestly, it's likely beyond the scope of both experts' insights and intuition to predict which base method, which company will reduce errors, achieve stable long runs, quickly achieve practical commercial use, and become mainstream. In such a situation, to grab stocks that will significantly increase in value from now on, it seems necessary to grab multiple promising methods from the Ion trap-based IONQ, superconducting-based RGTI, and semiconductor-connected ALAB, and then narrow down in the foreseeable future. If not, some companies are already in debt and unable to afford research and development costs, even before they establish themselves, their survival is questionable. Companies that are in debt before may also be on the verge of falling into debt in the next 2-3 years, so if there are no results within the next 2 years, there might also be forced exits. Research and development costs account for a large part of the cost, but on a quarterly basis, IONQ = 33.17 million, RGTI = 12.75 million, ALAB = 50.65 million, already significantly higher than rival companies with a tendency to be over-indebted, so I believe we should aim close to that goal and bet on it. I am just a novice, after all.It's a phase where it rises reasonably even if you grab multiple because it doesn't exceed the promising range. It's risky to grab blindly from the same method, so concentrate and expand.Ultimately, the goal is not just about being excellent in quantum and high-speed computation, but looking at it from the perspective of stock price, whether it can earn money commercially in the future.

Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only. Read more

See Original

Report

32K Views

Comment

ひろ0723 OP : In terms of superconducting technology, IBM Corp's research and development expenses are overwhelmingly different, but I wonder if RGTI will catch up once IBM Corp advances commercialization.

Report
Reply

Cancel Reply
ひろ0723 OP : If you include Brocom and Microsoft separately as high-tech large tech companies in indexes or FANG, that would be fine.

Report
Reply

Cancel Reply
ひろ0723 OP : In terms of usage purposes, there is not just one correct answer. There is definitely a good possibility for all three options.

Report
Reply

Cancel Reply

ひろ0723

NAS100でNISA満タン+NAS100ゴールド＋で勝負。SOX当面無視。2025データ系電力系・防衛宇宙・金・レジャー・量子でやり散らかす！

419

Followers

Following

1995

Visitors