Does Iran's anti-Israel, anti-American rhetoric just bark without biting? - Iran International
On August 27th, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, spoke to President Mahmoud Payeshkian and his cabinet, stating that dialogue with enemy countries is beneficial.
![Does Iran's anti-Israel, anti-American rhetoric just bark without biting? - Iran International](https://sgsnsimg.moomoo.com/sns_client_feed/181383973/20240904/5ddf6b6b85fb0b0822b4f56a40742056.jpg/big?area=105&is_public=true)
Referring vaguely to Iran's relations with the international community, particularly the United States, Ayatollah Khamenei stated that Iran should not rely on such relations, but that does not mean there is no reason to meet with enemies.
This can be seen as a kind of green light for President Payeshkian to engage with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Western countries once again regarding Iran's nuclear development program, and to engage with international dialogue partners regarding the rising tensions with Israel.
This statement seems to suggest a desire to return to the mutual deterrence that has defined the relationship between the two countries for many years, stepping away from the brink of all-out war with Israel following the assassination of Hamas political leader Ismail Hanyeh in Iran in July.
However, considering how much this region has changed in the past year, this may not be an option.
In April of this year, Israel targeted the Iranian embassy in Damascus and killed members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard.
As a result, Iran took calculated action. Iran could not ignore Israel's attacks, and the authorities condemned it as an attack on Iranian sovereignty, but they did not want a war with Israel. As a result, Israel and its allies were able to shoot down most of the 300+ missiles and drones launched from Iran.
Nevertheless, this response was seen as a victory for Iran, demonstrating its technological capability to reach Israel, and also marking a departure from Iran's established approach of talking tough but avoiding direct confrontation.
Iran clearly crossed a threshold in April, but seems to be very anxious about the consequences.
Then, on July 31st, Hanyeh was assassinated during his visit to Iran. Israel has neither confirmed nor denied responsibility, but there is a strong perception that Israel was behind it.
This has put the Iranian leadership in a difficult situation. Hardliners are calling for retaliation to restore Iran's image as a country that can protect itself and avenge the killing of a close ally. Ayatollah Khamenei has also claimed that Israel will be punished for its actions, but the timing is for Iran to choose.
The leadership in Iranshowing weakness and damaging their position among allies and proxies in the region such as Hamas, Hezbollah in Lebanon, Houthi rebels in Yemen, armed Shiite groups in Iraq and Syria, etc.It is clear that they cannot show weakness or damage their position among the allies and proxies in the region.However, there are other considerations weighing heavily on their minds.
A direct response to Israelcould open the Pandora's box.It could pave the way for further direct attacks by Israel, potentially even assassination attempts targeting Iranian leaders.
This is a realistic possibility. Israel has shown a willingness to respond to any threat with force in the name of self-defense. Additionally, after Iran's missile and drone attack in April, it has demonstrated the ability to carry out precise attacks within Iran, such as retaliating against the radar system in Isfahan city.
Furthermore, such escalationposes the risk of involving the USA in the conflictがある。
The Iranian leadership is skilled in brinkmanship diplomacy. Anti-Americanism is deeply rooted in the political discourse of the political elite and shapes Iran's foreign policy. However,Iran has thus far avoidedwar with the USA..
その理由は、イランの指導者たちはすでに自分たちの政治的将来について神経質になっており、イスラエルやアメリカとの対立は状況を深刻に悪化させる可能性があるからだ。
現在、社会の大部分と政権との間には大きな断絶がある。2年前、イランは「女性、生命、自由」を旗印にした自然発生的な反体制の大規模抗議デモに揺れた。ヒジャーブを正しく着用しなかったマフサ・アミニが拘束中に死亡したことを受けて始まったが、やがて「独裁政権の崩壊」とイスラム政権の終焉を求める反体制の反乱へと変貌した。反乱は武力、恣意的な拘束、処刑によって鎮圧された。
今年5月のエブラヒム・ライシ大統領のヘリコプター墜落事故死は、政権が改革派批判者との和解を求める好機となった。改革派の国会議員であるペゼシュキアン氏は、有権者の投票率を上げることを意図して、ライシ氏の後任選挙への出馬を審査され、承認された。イランの最高指導者は、政権の正当性を示す指標として投票率を繰り返し指摘してきた。
しかし、第1回投票の投票率はわずか39.9%で、イラン大統領選挙史上最低となり、最終回では49.8%にとどまった。これは、政治体制に対する国民の幻滅の深さを示している。多くの改革派は選挙をボイコットし、この選挙は見せかけのものであり、与党政権のための煙幕であると断じた。
Iran's legitimacy crisis has reached its peak, and the potential for renewed explosions is ripe. A war with Israel or the USA could ignite this tinderbox.
The Iranian leadership is facing a dilemma. It cannot retreat from its anti-Israel, anti-US rhetoric. Tehran has built a broad network, the so-called 'axis of resistance,' based on its diplomatic policy. It cannot betray this pillar of identity.
However, acting based on this can jeopardize the regime's survival. The leadership has been increasingly searching for a more precarious balance.
Hezbollah's recent engagement with Israel may be the answer. By supporting Hezbollah, Iran can claim to have inflicted pain on Israel without directly attacking itself.
The purpose is to restore the situation prior to April. This strategy aims to safeguard the ruling regime from a direct confrontation by entrusting the fighting to Hezbollah and other proxy forces, thereby avoiding a crisis to the leadership's authority and control.
However, this may be wishful thinking. This strategy might give Israel the legitimacy needed to attack Iran's targets again. And this could become a tinderbox of pent-up discontent among the people directed at the cruelty of the ruling regime.However, this may be wishful thinking. This strategy might give Israel the legitimacy needed to attack Iran's targets again. And this could become a tinderbox of pent-up discontent among the people directed at the cruelty of the ruling regime.がある。
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment