I feel something similar to web3 and quantum technology.
→ It is generating practical benefits, but it is no longer a post that should be released to the public at the level of impressions.
AI-based businesses are not making money.
→ If you have the opportunity to hear about the excitement of exhibitions, the fast start of AI startups, individual billion-dollar players, etc. (somehow the media doesn't cover it at all), and rely only on TV or web discussions, your perception will be distorted.
AI does not engage in creative activities.
→ If AI were to engage in creative activities, it would surpass the AI bubble.
OpenAI is in deep red.
It's only been a year and a half since AI came along, so it's only natural. I've never heard of a startup that generates a return on investment in just one year.
People who argue that the AI bubble is ending can generally be categorized into the following four categories, and what they are saying is unclear.
not pow noname : This comment was generated by AI
超長期投資家 : If you're not familiar with IT, you like conspiracy theories.
yudaikunz : I'm really supporting the introduction of generative AI because of my occupation.
I generally agree, but the benefits of AI in 1. are partial. Right now, I'm looking for ways to monetize it.
I think it's only a matter of time before impactful cases come out, but can investors wait to create cases? I have a question...
人類 : Compared to IT being a simple connection task, AI is an advanced technology that requires learning. Bubble sorry can't tell the difference!
HONDA N-ONE : We are still in the process of determining value, so there may be major adjustments once
However, since there is no room for objection to the market expanding, it is not strange if stock prices rise further
There is no clear definition of what an AI bubble is in the first place, so it's not a very constructive discussion