English
Back
Download
Log in to access Online Inquiry
Back to the Top

When browsing the internet, there are experts (self-proclaim...

When browsing the internet, there are experts (self-proclaimed?) who mention investment trusts like the current investment trust and Alliance D Course, which generate monthly distribution income, as investments not to be done due to high fees and risks such as octopus legs. How do you feel about their opinions?

Certainly, when fees and trust fees are high, it may feel safer and less risky in the long run to choose something like emax.
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only. Read more
12
1
+0
8
See Original
Report
68K Views
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
  • 信託投資の「。」 : Regardless of the octopus leg risk, I don't think trust fees are that important.
    In extreme terms, a product where the NAV decreases every month with zero trust fees.
    Do you think it's a better product than Besco because it has low trust fees?

  • 凡之介さん : An opinion? The conclusion is probably that “it's strange when products with different investment purposes are compared on the same playing field.”

    While there are options for “use, save, increase” money (it seems like a bank catchphrase...), people on YouTube are discussing on the premise of “increasing,” and I think they recommend long-term investments. Conversely, the monthly settlement type is a product that responds to “usage” needs, so the investment purpose (earthball) is different in the first place... Also, like Vesco's operation report report, etc.

    “It is a product that responds to beneficiaries' fund receipt needs by paying a fixed level of distribution every month while continuing operation.”

    It's described, isn't it? I wonder if both are at risk. Fees are structured to pay operating costs as long as they are active funds, and in the case of Vesco, I think they sufficiently produce returns commensurate with those costs. I don't think it's an octopus foot either.

  • ごとくん : The past 10-year average return is slightly above 11%... I'm not sure about the embedded trust fee in the NAV, but maybe I want to buy based on the performance. Even with a small buy-in plan, the performance is good so far.

  • つぅ_7366 : Even if there is a risk of dividend reinvestment in octopus leg dividends, as long as it is rising in the candlestick chart of dividend reinvestment, there should be no problem.

    If it is an index investment linked to the same indicators, it can be determined based on fees alone, but if the investment targets are different, it cannot be determined based solely on fees. It should be judged by total return with fees already included.

    ... I think this way about some experts (self-proclaimed?)

  • おすべらかしEL : Amateurs make more money if they do mutual funds.
    It seems like you'll be smarter if you do stocks, but I think it's better to start with a small amount. I am primary-zero due to profits from American stocks and losses in Japanese stocks. If you want to save money, mutual funds or money. If you're looking for gables, virtual currency is recommended.
    Of course, it's useless if you don't study, but I was able to make a lot of money with virtual currency.
    The S&P 500 has been running since the end of last year, and the profit is about 38%! Please do your best!

  • スマイリー山川 : If it's Jijibaba, I think it would be better to get monthly distributions
    It depends on age

  • トクリン スマイリー山川 : Since these writings are seen by various people, please be mindful of your expressions.
    What do you mean by old folks? You'll grow old too, eventually.

  • スマイリー山川 トクリン : I'm sorry...
    It seems to have had an effect.
    I will be careful.

52
Followers
6
Following
265
Visitors
Follow
Reassessing Chinese Assets
Following the introduction of China's groundbreaking DeepSeek technology, Wall Street giants have revised their investment outlooks for the Chinese market.