Nio vs XPeng. Both making EV. XPeng goes into the Flying car...
Nio vs XPeng. Both making EV. XPeng goes into the Flying car while Nio goes into Infrastructure with Nio Power Battery Swap and SuperCharger facilities. Betting which one is better? Of course betting Infrastructure is better. Just like you need a petrol kiosk to pump gasoline for your car. The Chinese Government is all out and wants to make an EV permanently now. Without the Infrastructure EV goes nowhere. Will Nio go bankrupt like what the naysayers say. Will the Chinese Government allow it to happen?
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
Dragon Fish OP : Remember Nio's new slogan.
When you want to change the battery you remember Nio.
Nio battery swap station is the money dispenser machine.
https://www.nio.com/nio-power?&noredirect=
Dragon Fish OP : Avatr Plugs Into Nio's Charging Network
Dragon Fish OP : Why more and more EV makers plug into Nio Power Infrastructures? Why? Why? Why?
bullbearnme : Xpev flying car is just a marketing. The main challenge is not making a flying car but permission to allow it flying above your head. Helicopter is nothing new, do you allow everyone to fly it above your head. Think of the risk of car flying down to the street , it is like bomb above your head and crash down to your house while you sleeping
bullbearnme : Xpev flying car will be useful for emergency such as ambulance , police but not public. It is a super niche market. Making it will cost more and it need to be high margin and enough sales volume to support the manufacturing cost and maintenance. This idea is worse than battery swap station. Therefore flying car is a stupid idea , just to attract people who dream big but not practical