NVDA
NVIDIA
-- 108.380 TSLA
Tesla
-- 259.160 PLTR
Palantir
-- 84.400 AMZN
Amazon
-- 190.260 AAPL
Apple
-- 222.130 
$NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$ We received some unfavorable information ...
We received some unfavorable information from Reuters.
If it continues to decline like this, it will look quite unfavorable from a weekly perspective...
Although not now, it seems like a good idea to initiate a sell soon.
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only.
Read more
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
snouman : What kind of information is available from Reuters?
GRRR4751頭ぷるきゅぴ : is this it? reuters.com/mar...
トゥーナ OP snouman : I think it will be decided soon.
So, I'll just say that it will be clear very soon.
トゥーナ OP GRRR4751頭ぷるきゅぴ : That's interesting information.
However, the answer is NO.
Mi_dori : There is no such information, please present the source if you want to refute it.
トゥーナ OP Mi_dori : If you think so, I personally think that's fine
Mi_dori トゥーナ OP : I don't quite understand. While it seems like a sentence meant to evoke empathy, stating that you received some unfavorable news from Reuters, no one else besides you knows about this information. Therefore, they are asking you to provide the source. It's not about whether you believe it or not, it's about whether that information exists. Are you withholding information? Or is it about paid content?
トゥーナ OP Mi_dori : The main reason I don't mention it here is because it's paid information. Although I mentioned Reuters, it's through paid information. There are also the preferences of the individuals involved, and there is no benefit in mentioning this information here. However, I believe you will quickly understand the meaning after some time has passed.
Mi_dori トゥーナ OP : I see, so that's how it is. It seems like we cannot provide paid information here. Thank you.
トゥーナ OP Mi_dori : No, I'm sorry I made you feel uncomfortable
To put it just a little bit, it's a rumor that everyone who invests in semiconductors has heard at least once
View more comments...