English
Back
Download
Log in to access Online Inquiry
Back to the Top

Seems conspiracy to wipe out investor

$FARFETCH LTD (FTCHF.US)$ It’s common delist into penny before material thing is out. It there’s no material on pricing, dealers guess, the board wants to wipe out investors. Wall street used to pay a little token money for bail out , to avoid troubles in future. Nowadays, IB kids are ruthless, business leaders do not care legal or reputation consequences. There are lots of games can be played and had been used in Asian many time.
But there are consequences. You don’t pay premium, market believes you bought negative value things. Even coupang could buy like 90% off, stock price drop sharply as 500M USD are wasted. To save 50 cents to 1 dollar per share, you screw up investors and most importantly large institute, they will blacklist you dishonestly. If you know individual investor of Farfetch, what kind of fool trys to publicly rob money from richest people, they don’t care the money at all, but they care reputation/ face. They have full time lawyer for fun, sorry to f??k whoever want to play direct game. Without court approval, such wipping out 100% will receive lawsuit and some clawback, if farfatch will revive. US court does NOT protect retail investor, but protect minor interest. I know a few cases, the conspircy does win, but their dirty game costs a lot of time and legal fees. Losing more than they took.
Anyway, don’t buy unless you are experienced otc player. I have holding period requirement from employer. I’ll keep my shares until conclusion.
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only. Read more
2
+0
8
Translate
Report
10K Views
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
个人投资观点。没有FINRA执照,不代表供职的机构或客户(反正我看不到)。不提供投资建议。临时改个名,免得被citadel找麻烦
282
Followers
20
Following
1960
Visitors
Follow
Discussing
Trump 2.0 Era: How will global markets evolve?
🎙️Discussion: 1. How will tariff policies affect the movement of key assets such as U.S. stocks, gold, and Bitcoin? 2. Given this context, Show More