So far I read a report about the Nio Charging operator in Ch...

103027647 : they need build more to satisfied onvo users and new firefly swap station thus can report huge losses next quarter .nio always got reason to lose billion frightened away big fund like ballie .just a junk mgmt company

Dragon Fish OP 103027647 : Nio New Generation Swap Station already can cater for Onvo and Firefly EV. Only the old stations need modifications to suit Onvo EV now. So far the main concern is continuing high Opex for the ongoing Onvo and Firefly project.  

103027647 : with ten year huge rnd 10billion USD loss still lose out to one Xiaomi model su7 and no need useless swap.li auto and Xiaomi proven no need swap as long U got one hot model selling crazy can be profitable.no surprised Xiaomi may achieve profitable before nio.then nio CEO got many excuse to say lose moneyin rnd and many pple give him money to toy I rnd and burn cash .so far useless product like nio phone 2 .even solid state battery Also too costly to sell and need rent cheaply after rnd huge amount of money

Dragon Fish OP 103027647 : Xiaomi started with a cheapskate model like usual their Xiaomi products too. Their strategy is to capture market shares even with loss they also don't mind. They have cash to burn is ok.

74216494 Dragon Fish OP : XIAOMI will be profitable much earlier than NIO. Cash burn of NIO by far exceeds XIAOMIs. However, NIOs market share drops. That is the difference.

Dragon Fish OP 74216494 : Xiaomi learning curve is short. Nio learning curve is long because Nio is a pioneer in EV.

74216494 Dragon Fish OP : Yes, the learning curve of "The Leading ZERO" of NIO is long. May be, too long. Although, should be easy to learn the lessons from VW etc. that you first have to develop and sell a car for mass market, make some money with it and then sell higher end models. For NIO, it takes very long to learn even this. Harmful, because obviously competition is much smarter.