Account Info
Log Out
English
Back
Log in to access Online Inquiry
Back to the Top

“Speculator's yen sales” finally stopped due to a sharp drop to 155 yen per dollar... is there any possibility that it will continue to decline? [Predicted by international financial analysts]

$Nikkei 225(.N225.JP)$If the yen appreciates, export companies will definitely lose sales, so I'm looking forward to the settlement. Moreover, if Japan goes in the direction of depreciation of the yen due to a decline in national power, it will be efficient and the future of Japan will be bright if there are no middle-aged and elderly people who can't work. Also, if you don't hire incompetent people and let AGI do it, even more so
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only. Read more
1
See Original
Report
2055 Views
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
  • しゅうちゃん_Rm : The meaning of saying that if there are no middle-aged and elderly people who can't work, it will be efficient is unclear.

    Expenses for wasteful labor costs are reduced, but since unnecessary human resources do not need to be restructured, fixed costs are reduced and profit margins increase to a certain extent. However, unnecessary factors have been removed and excluded, and I don't think those people have influence that interferes with efficiency improvements because they have influence over work,
    Ventilation will certainly improve, though.
    Rather than that, unless work efficiency is improved by utilizing and combining IT technology, etc. and existing services, such as unifying people, goods, money, and information, for the 3M of waste, unreasonable, and uneven, efficiency cannot be achieved without denying fixed concepts or past work methods as commonplace, feeling no questions, and changes. Awareness reform is also important. It is only by reviewing work methods and flows at the reform level from improvement to reform that it is necessary to have a system and systematization that eliminates waste, overwork, and waste, and a simple system can cover profit rate increases and human resource shortages by improving efficiency by unifying people, goods, money, and information that have established a system, even when improving efficiency that relies on software development.
    Therefore, saying that efficiency can be improved by eliminating the beginning, etc., can only be said to be a foolish question whose meaning is unclear because it is like shifting responsibility to people and poking at the corner of a heavy box and pointing it out.
    If there is a shortage of manpower, it is necessary to pass on technology, and to create a system that can be covered by manualizing work flowcharts on a daily basis so that even if someone is on maternity leave, childcare leave, or suddenly hospitalized, there is no work hindrance. For example, in a manufacturing plant, it is important for one person to learn how to operate multiple models and promote multi-functional engineering. Since everything is not only at manufacturing sites, but also in a wide range of office work, inheriting daily work, weekly work, monthly work, etc. that are normally performed by other people even in the division of labor, and creating a system where multiple people can do it is also a preparation for improving efficiency, and various other risk management are also necessary for improving efficiency
    Are you saying that these can be solved and efficiency can be improved by making middle-aged people who don't do unnecessary work stop? So, I think that's why it's meaningless. Rather than blaming others, I think it's important to focus on your own wisdom and work positively to improve efficiency by cooperating with each other's vertical and horizontal connections.

234Followers
0Following
1440Visitors
Follow