English
Back
Download
Log in to access Online Inquiry
Back to the Top

Stuck at the verbal concept of "shared prosperity for all".

$SSE Composite Index (000001.SH)$ The government should establish a reits investment fund for all, in order to provide peace of mind and active participation for everyone. The government can distribute interest higher than banks and share the premium of stocks every year while ensuring that the principal is never lost. This aligns with the government's advocacy of shared prosperity for all, and also helps prevent hostile, malicious, and rampant actions by foreign capital in both mainland and Hong Kong stock markets and financial markets. Isn't this more effective, practical, and capable of long-term stimulating consumption and driving the development of various industries than the current market rescue policy schemes?
Secondly, with the arrival of the AI era, how can the government solve high unemployment rates? Providing aid funds is unsustainable, isn't a reits investment fund for all the best solution? To prevent any losses in the fund, the government can distribute IPOs to the reits fund proportionally to the public, and can also include some profitable businesses and other income into the fund.
Disclaimer: Community is offered by Moomoo Technologies Inc. and is for educational purposes only. Read more
5
1
+0
2
See Original
Report
50K Views
Comment
Sign in to post a comment
  • KingNY-Life : A-share shareholders have been slashed for many years. The government will never be able to make shareholders make money, and the malicious manipulation of institutions has never been concerned!

  • KHT : In A-shares, 75% are retail investors, in contrast, in US stocks, 75% are institutions, this is the difference between them.