$Tesla (TSLA.US)$ (Latest Updated Version) The NHSTA of the ...

The U.S. federal government's NHSTA and state governments' DMVs in the Americas do not permit Tesla to "test-drive on public roads without a driver" or even operate a "robo-taxi business"! In each state of the United States, there is a facility equivalent to a driver's license center called the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). The DMV manages driving permits on public roads and the renewal of driver's licenses. It also publishes the qualification exams related to autonomous driving as "public documents."

References

Autonomous Vehicle Testing Permit Holders

This is a list of companies holding autonomous vehicle testing permits.

This document includes

- Permits Holders (Testing with a driver)

- Permits Holders (Driverless Testing)

- Permits Holders (Deployment)

3 categories:

The term "former" refers to companies that have passed the qualification test for test driving on public roads with a driver present, the "middle" refers to companies that have passed the qualification test for test driving on public roads without a driver present, and the "latter" applies to both the former two, referring to companies or organizations involved in the development of self-driving cars and conducting test drives on public roads. Companies with the permit of the "latter" are approved to operate taxi services as commercial services.

There is a Tesla company name for "Permits Holders (Testing with a driver)"

(Companies authorized to test drive on public roads with a driver present) includes the name of Tesla.

Has the name of Tesla, Inc.

Permits Holders (Driverless Testing)

No Tesla name, but names of companies led by Google - Waymo, and Amazon - Zoox!

(Companies authorized to test drive on public roads without a driver present) does not include the name of Tesla.

Permits Holders (Deployment)

No mention of the name for Tesla, led by Google's Waymo, Mercedes-Benz has a name!

(Companies authorized to operate taxi services as commercial services) does not include the name of Tesla.

There is no mention of Tesla's name after these two parties.

Elon Musk will launch a robot taxi business on October 10th, but not in his home country, the USA.

Start in china and europe

The reason to tell lies and excuses

In the United States, regulatory authorities do not approve Tesla's robot taxi business, so it's a stopgap measure.

China and europe

and saying they are starting from there

Reference

Implementing FSD in China and Europe.

In general, it is because the DMV still does not allow test driving Tesla cars on public roads at level 4 of autonomous driving (= no driver), as they only have immature level 2 autonomous driving technology.

Danger.

is the unequivocal reality i.e. they determine and are certain that this is what it is.

That's why Tesla is taking this qualification exam on September 12, 2023, but the DMV is

not qualified for Tesla

Is having a stigma.

The evidence that Tesla failed the DMV qualification exam is

References

In particular, the one line in this document.

Tesla has not started testing unmanned driving with no one in the driver's seat because the software is not ready.

At 50 seconds of the video for the public advertisement regarding Tesla's fully automatic driving free trial by The Dawn Project.

Tesla took the DMV qualification test on September 12, 2023 but failed.

Tesla stock price, the possibility of moving up or down 20% on the announcement day of the Robotaxi, X-Day is October 10.

Could 'Cyber Cab' have an unprecedented impact?

In particular, the sentence in this document.

According to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) in California,

Tesla has obtained a driver-assisted public road driving license.

However,

"There is no driving record for 2023.

And there it is.

Tesla, which failed the qualification test for unmanned test driving on public roads in the usa,

Can Tesla pass the qualification test for unmanned test driving on public roads in China and Europe?

It is unlikely that dangerous vehicles that could potentially take human lives will be left unchecked in any country.

What I want to strongly argue is,

Elon Musk is boasting as if he can realize the robot taxi business right now,

After passing the qualification test that allows testing on public roads using level 4 self-driving cars (unmanned) by the DMV, one should declare it as such.

That's the idea.

If you take Elon Musk's whimsical claims at face value, you will have a terrible experience. I conclude that both the Japanese media and Japanese investors in Tesla are overestimating Elon Musk and Tesla as detached from reality.

Both Waymo led by Google and Cruise led by GM are allowed to operate unmanned taxi services because they passed the qualification test of the DMV. The reason Cruise's name is not mentioned in the DMV documents after the two is due to California's immediate suspension of Cruise's autonomous vehicle deployment and unmanned driving test permits.

is the cause.

It is often misunderstood, but both Waymo and Cruise

Have you manufactured a car that has been certified as self-driving level 3 or self-driving level 4? It is only as part of a "test drive".

It is just approved for a test drive at self-driving level 4 on public roads.

Only public road test drives at self-driving level 4 are approved.

That's all.

According to the definition of SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers = American Association of Automobile Engineers), even in the wide world, self-driving cars Level 3 have been certified.

- Honda's "Legend" (limited to 100 units)

- Mercedes-Benz flagship models "S-Class" and sedan "EQS" (world's first mass-produced sales)

There are only self-driving level 4 or higher approved vehicles in existence.

Waymo led by Google, Cruise led by GM, and Zoox led by Amazon have all passed the qualification test to operate on public roads at self-driving level 4 (i.e., without a driver) established by the DMV. Please take note of the reality that even Tesla has not passed this qualification test.

Reference

"Level 3 automated driving, first deployment in the USA by Mercedes! Tesla's reputation is completely shattered."

Elon Musk himself

Regulatory approval will be granted immediately.

They are boasting, but it is a pathological optimistic observation of a fraudster.

The evidence for this is

Reference

Here, the regulatory authorities mentioned by Elon Musk are

DMV (Department of Motor Vehicles = USA Department of Motor Vehicles)

.

NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration = USA Ministry of Transportation Road Traffic Safety Administration)

that's it.

The reason why there have been numerous fatal accidents caused by Tesla's FSD (Full Self Driving = fully automatic driving), is under intense investigation with the most suspicion on FSD at Tesla.

Regulatory authorities

It is that person.

To make matters worse, the state of California is

amended auto law

due to Tesla, which has only the ability of self-driving level 2

Tesla prohibits the use of the name FSD.

【Important Points Pick-Up】

U.S. authorities ⇦Important (1)

NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) ⇦ important (2)

Currently investigating whether FSD (= full self-driving) is operating properly

Actively researching

is.

As Tesla's self-driving system only uses cameras, it may cause issues. ⇦Important (3)

【Footnote】

Competing companies authorized by NHSTA and DMV to 'test drive unmanned (level 4 self-driving cars) on public roads' are also equipped with riders (LiDAR) in addition to cameras and radars.

【End of Footnote】

【Evidence documents (1) (2) (3)】

Excerpt quoted.

To start a Robo-Taxi business

Signs from the US federal government and regulatory authorities are crucial (4).

【Footnote】

State regulatory authorities refer to the state government's DMV. To operate a robo-taxi business, approval from the US federal government's NHTSA is required.

【End of Footnote】

Tesla still does not have a license to test driverless vehicles in California, which is important (5).

Evidence document (4) (5)

Excerpted quote.

And

Tesla's 'Autopilot'

を

- Basic preventive measures are not sufficient.

And the US federal authorities regard it as crucial (7).

- Tesla also does not take measures to prevent foreseeable accidents.

Tesla's advanced driving features do not include the basic safety precautions that other rival companies have implemented.

Therefore,

"Tesla stands out in the industry" ⇦ Important (8) Naturally

concluded.

【Footnotes】

Tesla's competitors evoke fraudulent appellations of fully autonomous driving.

【End of footnote】

Furthermore

US authorities, California regulatory authorities, US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)

The US government engineering team, important to the US Department of Justice ⇦ (9).

are

• Doubts about Full Self-Driving

Many accidents that careful drivers can avoid are occurring frequently FSD is ⇦ less than human!

• Questioning the name 'FSD' as well

• Concluded that FSD has slower response compared to competitors

• Investigating software updates

• Researching the FSD feature and the range of battery-powered EVs

【Evidence (6) (7) (8) (9)】

Quoted excerpt from the source.

The swindler of the century has a secret agreement with Trump.

(The English text above)

It is said that they are exchanging. If this secret agreement succeeds, and if by any chance NHSTA and DMV approve Tesla to "test-drive without a driver" and to operate the "robo-taxi business", then the USA will no longer be worthy of respect, it will be the end of the century.

"Test-driving without a driver on public roads"

as well as

Engaging in the robot taxi business.

If approving the operation of robot taxi services, the USA would no longer be respected, it would be the end of the century.

In the latter reference above,

guarantee of regulatory easing and preferential treatments

So far, it is a policy reason to support Mr. Trump, but there was a more unsavory reason for Mr. Mask's change of religion.

The Washington Post's Josh Dowsey, Eva Dow, and Faiz Siddiqui reported this way.

The reason for Mr. Musk's splendid transformation was seen as business obstruction under the Biden administration

The Ministry of Transport's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration concluded in 2020 that Tesla's driving assistance feature Autopilot, using self-driving technology, did not have sufficient basic preventive measures, and has also started a new investigation.

In parallel, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has decided to re-examine the marketing of Tesla's new model 'Model 3'.

It was the worst timing for Tesla, facing challenging sales performance.

Mask seemed to sense that Mr. Biden was adopting a dismissive stance towards Tesla behind these moves.

Furthermore, while the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) initiated an investigation into allegations of sexual harassment within SpaceX aiming for Mars exploration, the White House also showed reluctance towards SpaceX and SpaceLink by expressing reservations about the new 10-year government contracts (totaling a new 12 billion dollars)

Mask considered the Democratic Party government, which he thought was a proponent of change, as nothing but a conservative who interfered with his innovative business.

Trump, sensing this change of heart, 'courted' Musk, promising easing of permits and favorable treatment for Musk's business.

(washingtonpost.com/musk-trump-endorsement-immigration/)

It is certain.

Precious lives are taken by EVs causing multiple fatal accidents in the USA. Such a thing will never be forgiven by God!

Reference

[Conclusion]

I do not care about Tesla's unscrupulous business practices, etc.

It's good if it's profitable.

and supports Elon Musk.

Do not forgive the divine figure and the black company Tesla.

Certainly, that retribution will strike you.

This

Retribution is inevitable, the net of heaven is vast and covers everything without any leaks.

.

Those of you who support Tesla and Elon Musk would not be surprised if they were held accountable for crimes equal to those they are accused of.