ニャンチケ
liked
$Futu Holdings Ltd (FUTU.US)$
It's important to sell trending stocks at the right time.
It's important to sell trending stocks at the right time.
Translated
Unsupported module.
Please view on mobile devices.
2
ニャンチケ
liked
$Crude Oil Futures(DEC4) (CLmain.US)$ You raised it again at once.
Translated
4
1
I can't believe Min-kabu is purposely bringing up such obvious topics. Were you asked by someone to do so? 😂
Those who already have these are hodling.
However, tomorrow is basically Black Monday 2.0, so everything will be cheap to buy everywhere. Welcome, bargain hunters! 🤗 Of course, I also plan to buy more myself.
Those who already have these are hodling.
However, tomorrow is basically Black Monday 2.0, so everything will be cheap to buy everywhere. Welcome, bargain hunters! 🤗 Of course, I also plan to buy more myself.
Translated
1
ニャンチケ
liked
$Tauns Laboratories (197A.JP)$
Ishiba is extremely shocked, but I don't understand why they are selling this area cheaply at PTS, but everyone has different ways of thinking. I gratefully picked it up. This place is popping.
But Ishiba, huh?It's finally the end for japan. Countdown to the China People's Japan Autonomous Region. For now, you shouldn't vote for the Liberal Democratic Party in the House of Representatives election.
Ishiba is extremely shocked, but I don't understand why they are selling this area cheaply at PTS, but everyone has different ways of thinking. I gratefully picked it up. This place is popping.
But Ishiba, huh?It's finally the end for japan. Countdown to the China People's Japan Autonomous Region. For now, you shouldn't vote for the Liberal Democratic Party in the House of Representatives election.
Translated
1
ニャンチケ
liked
$Spdr Gold Minishares Trust (GLDM.US)$
Finally touched the Sigma 3 of the Bollinger Bands, it seems to be rising between Sigma 2 and Sigma 3 for a while.
Finally touched the Sigma 3 of the Bollinger Bands, it seems to be rising between Sigma 2 and Sigma 3 for a while.
Translated
17
1
ニャンチケ
liked
$Alphabet-A (GOOGL.US)$
Actually, there was a deadlock in the cloud on Friday in the 4-hour chart 🤛
If it breaks through on Monday and Tuesday, it will be a challenge to Fibonacci 50% (around 164), but in the daily chart this is a cloud ☁️ If it breaks through, the upward trend will be justified by crossing the neckline ✨
However, personally, I think that there will be a slight adjustment there for a while, and if it bounces back, it will be supported around 155.5 and assume it as the 1st and 2nd wave, it seems that it will be a cloud in the 3rd wave, and a re-challenge of the neckline...
It is scheduled for earnings announcement on 10/22, and considering the current low PER, I think it won't drop below 147 unless it fails miserably.
On the contrary, it will clear the cloud and go to fill the gap of 177 at the timing when it is justified by the PER in the settlement, and it will be my main scenario to update the highest value towards the end of the year.
As a pattern that denies this,
1. Deterioration of employment statistics
2. Trump's election, or credible information that would be advantageous
3. I missed the settlement.
I'm watching, so I want to be mindful of that.
It's unrelated, but why does it break into one line when I break here...
Actually, there was a deadlock in the cloud on Friday in the 4-hour chart 🤛
If it breaks through on Monday and Tuesday, it will be a challenge to Fibonacci 50% (around 164), but in the daily chart this is a cloud ☁️ If it breaks through, the upward trend will be justified by crossing the neckline ✨
However, personally, I think that there will be a slight adjustment there for a while, and if it bounces back, it will be supported around 155.5 and assume it as the 1st and 2nd wave, it seems that it will be a cloud in the 3rd wave, and a re-challenge of the neckline...
It is scheduled for earnings announcement on 10/22, and considering the current low PER, I think it won't drop below 147 unless it fails miserably.
On the contrary, it will clear the cloud and go to fill the gap of 177 at the timing when it is justified by the PER in the settlement, and it will be my main scenario to update the highest value towards the end of the year.
As a pattern that denies this,
1. Deterioration of employment statistics
2. Trump's election, or credible information that would be advantageous
3. I missed the settlement.
I'm watching, so I want to be mindful of that.
It's unrelated, but why does it break into one line when I break here...
Translated
13
4