$Bitcoin (BTC.CC)$ This should be today#Web3and#AIThe most explosive news in the field, but nobody mentioned it! AI cracked the Riemann hypothesis, my#BTCFaith may collapse! If the Riemann hypothesis is proven, especially through AI, it may directly impact the security and operation mechanisms of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies! 1. Potential impact on cryptocurrency security Prime number generation and public key encryption - Bitcoin and many cryptocurrencies rely on Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) and hash functions, while traditional RSA encryption relies on the difficulty of factoring large prime numbers. - If the proof of the Riemann hypothesis introduces new number theory tools, it may indirectly optimize algorithms for factoring large integers or the efficiency of prime number generation. - Threat to RSA encryption: Although Bitcoin does not directly use RSA, many other systems depend on it, which may be affected. - Possibility of accelerating attacks on ECC: If a new algorithm can break certain assumptions of elliptic curves, the security of Bitcoin's private keys may be threatened. (2) Security of hash functions - Bitcoin relies on the SHA-256 hash function, which is fundamentally unrelated to the Riemann hypothesis. - However, if the proof of the Riemann hypothesis involves deep-seated randomness theory, it may theoretically affect the collision probability or irreversibility of hash functions. 2. Impact on miners and blockchain (1) Miner efficiency - The new algorithms introduced in the proof process may optimize random number generation, modular arithmetic, or other cryptographic calculations, thereby improving mining efficiency. - Efficient algorithms may lower the computational threshold, attract more miners, and even lead to further congestion and increased power consumption. (2) Potential for blockchain attacks - If the proof introduces breakthrough mathematical tools (such as efficient inversion modulo arithmetic), it may make it easier for attackers to forge transactions or generate false blocks, thus threatening the integrity of the blockchain. 3. Indirect impact on the concept of decentralization (1) Accelerating the adoption of new encryption technologies - if existing algorithms like Bitcoin are deemed no longer secure, cryptocurrencies may turn to post-quantum cryptography (such as lattice-based or multivariate polynomial-based algorithms) to defend against potential threats. - The concept of decentralization may thus accelerate technological updates, but also bring about uncertainty. (2) Regulation and technological change - If the proof of the Riemann hypothesis is maliciously exploited (such as cracking existing cryptocurrencies), it may trigger widespread market turmoil. - Governments or institutions of various countries may strengthen regulation of cryptocurrencies, or even introduce more secure Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). 4. Possibility of specific impacts - Limited short-term impact: The core dependencies of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies (ECC and hash functions) will not be immediately breached by the proof of the Riemann hypothesis. - Long-term potential threat: If the new mathematical tools in the proof are further developed to optimize attack algorithms, it may have profound implications on the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Currently, all AI companies are verifying the authenticity. If true, this undoubtedly has a huge impact on mathematics and cryptography, and whether to prohibit AI from further learning and development will become a new proposition!

$Advanced Micro Devices (AMD.US)$ I would like to remind everyone again, opportunities are rare after 182.

$Newmont (NEM.US)$ This looks good, buy a little at 47.75 to try it out.

$Trump Media & Technology (DJT.US)$ Breakfast 52 didn't sell, I'm sorry...

$Cassava Sciences (SAVA.US)$ What's the situation?

$Vinco Ventures (BBIG.US)$ Nice

$Vinco Ventures (BBIG.US)$ fasten your seatbelt

$Vinco Ventures (BBIG.US)$ Wash the plate, wash wash wash 🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨