US markets trade around record all time highs with the S&P500 up 22% this year, highs, thanks to better-than-expected US corporate news and US economic data. But what's ahead? Big tech earnings and the US election and stimulus from two biggest countries, China and the US.
Tesla shares rose 22%, its biggest gain since May 2013 spurring a rally in the “Magnificent Seven” stocks, which hit a three-month high. If $Tesla (TSLA.US)$ 's...

$Coca-Cola (KO.US)$Coca-Cola earnings conference call is scheduled for October 23 at 8:30 AM ET /October 23 at 8:30 PM SGT /October 23 at 11:30 PM AEST. Subscribe to join the live earnings conference with management NOW!
Beat or Miss?
What do you expect from Coca-Cola's Q3 2024 earnings? Will the company beat or miss the estimates? Make sure to click the "Book" button to get what managements have to say!
Disclaimer:
This presentation is for information and educa...

$NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$
NVIDIA Q2 FY2025 earnings conference call is scheduled for August 28 at 5:00 PM EDT /August 29 at 5:00 AM SGT /August 29 at 7:00 AM AEST. Subscribe to join the live earnings conference with management NOW!
Beat or Miss?
What do you expect from NVIDIA's Q2 earnings? Will the company beat or miss the estimates? Make sure to click the "Book" button to get what management has to say!
Disclaimer:
This presentation is for information and ...

$Tesla (TSLA.US)$
Can it reach 1280 tomorrow?

$Procter & Gamble (PG.US)$ $Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.US)$ $Microsoft (MSFT.US)$ $Costco (COST.US)$ To me I think of proctor and gamble more as a way to preserve already attained wealth. To me that would be something like $50 to $100k i didn't want to risk much of and may still be some years from retirement.
If I was within maybe 5 years I'd maybe have even less than the $100k (for example) in something like a PG just to make up for inflation.
Anyways I'm wondering if someone like myself that's in accumulation mode should even have a stock like PG with any sizeable percentage.
I mean if I have 10 to 20 years till retirement, why not something like COST instead? Or heck even MSFT performing poorly should give a better return than Proctor and Gamble.
Even things like JNJ. Are those better suited to preserving already attained wealth?
I realize bonds were in the past, but now they don't yield that much.
Back in John Bogles days bonds could yield up to 10% with relatively low risk.
So I guess my main question is is it better to be mostly in growth type stocks if you have a long runway and not much of a portfolio?
Does holding 5% in Proctor and Gamble (one stock for example) do anything for someone sub 6 figures portfolio?
Or instead of a percentage in PG type stocks, wouldn't the sp500 index make more sense?