戒律 : I buy stocks on a dip that I am convinced will have a big impact in the future, and sell when they soar and the deviation rate becomes large. It seems like occasional buying and selling, not adjusting the shareholding ratio.

戒律 : It may be better not to buy stocks without profits on margin.

戒律 : Nvidia has started to decline.
Broadcom's outlook was bullish.

戒律 : Actually, sell aggressively.

戒律 : I agree that provocateurs can be annoying, but for them, it's necessary to attract attention by:
1. Expressing things sensationally,
2. Cherry-picking convenient data with confirmation bias,
3. Presenting easy-to-understand conclusions even if the analysis is shallow.
It's a rational behavior to make viewers feel good, so it's inevitable in a way. Although it can be bothersome, since investing is a matter of personal responsibility, they shouldn't be held accountable. When it comes to investment mindset, it's separate from everyday life. If you want to succeed, you have to play the game of solitude and let go of blaming others. It may leave you feeling uneasy, but that's how investing works.
If a movie recommended by a friend turns out to be uninteresting after you've said it's interesting, there's no relationship or theme involved when it comes to investments. Even if investment advisors who charge for information provide more specific suggestions than influencers, they never compensate for losses.

戒律 tail_up OP : There was a trading genius.

戒律 tail_up OP : Are you looking at this Candlestick as a range from 17.6 to 28? If it's okay, could you please provide an explanation? Rather than provocation, I'm interested in whether there are people with special trading senses.

戒律 : By the way, from a sharp rise:
1. A while ago, on the third day of bearish candlestick, there was a rebound ✕
2. Rebound near the support level where it rebounded last time △
3. A significant breakout through the 25ma and a rebound ✕
△ might be a buy.
✕ is not a buy. 1 is too shallow to buy, 3, if bought, might expect a rebound at 25ma, but might trigger stop-loss rule.
That's how I feel about the above.
In the first place, it's not a stock with fundamentals support, but a trendy theme stock related to casual nuclear energy, so after a sharp rise, there is also a downward risk for a full pullback, and it's hard to anticipate a solid and range-bound trend.

戒律 : Thank you for the explanation. Since the results are superior in every aspect, I think it's great if you are winning. After the Trump market, there is a sense of excitement in the market, so there may be a certain buying demand near the recent low around the high price range after the sharp rise for a while.

戒律 : Even a CEO with a track record in Manufacturing is at a loss...

戒律 : In my opinion, there is no way to get an answer from the miscellaneous people on the internet whether
1. it will rise again
2. when it will rise, even if you ask. It's the same for famous analysts and savvy traders. If you can understand that kind of thing, you can increase your assets as much as you want.
Intel had a story supported by around 800 billion in subsidies associated with the new factory scheduled to start operations in 2026. They were planning to steer towards manufacturing by bringing in a CEO with a background in manufacturing. However, the CEO stepped down as of the 1st. The situation where a certain supported story is now shrouded in dark clouds. There were even talks of selling the company in the past 2-3 months, but those discussions seem to have disappeared. Since the future is unclear, the supply and demand are likely to be poor for a while. Even if the stock price recovers, it will take a long time. For example, if GPUs become commoditized and partner with Arm, companies other than Nvidia can also create AI semiconductors. Depending on the application, the field of AI is diversifying, and both AMD and Intel are expected to divide the market share by field. The market for automotive applications is expanding rapidly, and partnerships have been formed with Tesla for manufacturing. I don’t think the performance will improve unless there are miraculous developments like these. And if you expect such miracles, I think you can buy it at best when it has already happened and has gone up by about 20% at the initial stage. In other words, I don't see a reason to buy now, so I think it's better to shift funds to stocks with a different and truly attractive story. So, why Intel?

戒律 : Are you a god?

戒律 OP : In the end, NVIDIA has reached a new high.
AppLovin has doubled.
Lately, I feel like we don't need social features in investment apps. There are so many crazy predictions and statements flying around that it's getting tiresome.
I tend to post like on Twitter, but even if I throw in a useful hint, if it gets buried in the garbage, it's not much different from nothing. So, I think it's best to trade quietly without getting involved in discussions, and that's the right answer.
In the end, I still think we don't need social features...

戒律 OP : Continuation. I have taken profit on applovin. In the end, it was around 5 times.
This year's performance is at an all-time high since the Trump market rally.
As the next gainianbankuai, I think software-related stocks will continue to be sought after, but I also consider energy to be stable, so I plan to have a roughly equal split.