egan1
commented on
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ remember folks- there isn't, and won't be a q computer on the planet that has an actual use... ( give it a decade or so).
1
7
egan1
reacted to
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ u need to start blasting man!!!
2
8
egan1
commented on
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$ It has to close above 40.70ish to go back up :(
3
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$
Scott McNealy was the CEO of Sun Microsystems, one of the darlings of the dot com bubble. At its peak his stock hit valuation of ten-times revenues. A couple of years afterward he had this to say about that time:
At 10 times revenues, to give you a 10-year payback, I have to pay you 100% of revenues for 10 straight years in dividends. That assumes I can get that by my shareholders. That assumes I have zero cost of goods sold, which is very hard for a computer c...
Scott McNealy was the CEO of Sun Microsystems, one of the darlings of the dot com bubble. At its peak his stock hit valuation of ten-times revenues. A couple of years afterward he had this to say about that time:
At 10 times revenues, to give you a 10-year payback, I have to pay you 100% of revenues for 10 straight years in dividends. That assumes I can get that by my shareholders. That assumes I have zero cost of goods sold, which is very hard for a computer c...
1
1
egan1
liked and commented on
$IonQ Inc (IONQ.US)$
A=P(1+R)^T <- compound intrest formula
22.04M <-annual revenue
A=22.04(1+.5)^6
A=251.05M with 50% yoy revenue growth for 6 years
171.69M <- current annual operating expenses
251.05M-171.69M = 79.36M profit
8.22B <- current market cap
8.22B/79.36M = 103.6p/e
Buying at these prices is essentially betting on 50%+ yoy revenue growth for the next 6y (hard). A market that's willing to buy the stock at 100+p/e (harder), and 0 increase in operating expenses (harde...
A=P(1+R)^T <- compound intrest formula
22.04M <-annual revenue
A=22.04(1+.5)^6
A=251.05M with 50% yoy revenue growth for 6 years
171.69M <- current annual operating expenses
251.05M-171.69M = 79.36M profit
8.22B <- current market cap
8.22B/79.36M = 103.6p/e
Buying at these prices is essentially betting on 50%+ yoy revenue growth for the next 6y (hard). A market that's willing to buy the stock at 100+p/e (harder), and 0 increase in operating expenses (harde...
4
7
egan1
commented on
Powell attends U.S. Senate hearing for February 11 at 10:00 AM ET /February 11 at 11:00 PM SGT/February 12 at 2:00 AM AEST. Subscribe to join the live NOW!
Powell is set to face Congress for the first time this year, with statements regarding the timing of interest rate cuts becoming a focal point for the market. It is worth mentioning that this will be his first questioning by congressional members since July of last year.
Disclaimer:
This presentation is for...
Powell is set to face Congress for the first time this year, with statements regarding the timing of interest rate cuts becoming a focal point for the market. It is worth mentioning that this will be his first questioning by congressional members since July of last year.
Disclaimer:
This presentation is for...
![](https://usliveimg.moomoo.com/live_client/77777055/20250210/12d45c83f9e7fefad547e68896c7def3.png/thumb?area=100&is_public=true)
Powell attends U.S. Senate hearing
Feb 11 23:00
15
7
5
egan1
commented on
$Super Micro Computer (SMCI.US)$ they've literally been convicted of fraud. move on...
2
15
egan1
liked
$U.S. 10-Year Treasury Notes Yield (US10Y.BD)$ we just had an economic indicator come out it showed one year inflation went from 1.3 to 4.3% that's what sent the market straight down that's what sent treasuries yields up and you just had the first bobblehead on TV saying we could be going to 480 again that's not good for stocks so this is exactly what I talked about this morning
2
4
$Strategy (MSTR.US)$ big bro is doing the equivalent of buying bitcoin on a credit card. Does anyone know/done the math on how low Bitcoin has to go to trigger a margin call on MSTR?
1
3
egan1 Jay Sah : yes, we knew Ai would be useful 3 years ago bc it was already being used to optimize delivery routes, stocking levels, traffic flows, and more since the early 2000s. All that's new is chat bots and image/video generation. and besides, even if this has revenue growth like nvida (~50% yoy) over the next 3 years, they would still be losing money. we are confident bc we've done the research. Google themselves say they need 1m qubits to become useful and they have 105 working and its taken 25 years to get to that. so a decade estimate is if anything not long enough.
egan1 152343525 OP : lmao fr. Google came out and say they beat classical computers by generating random numbers when that randomness is literally just a product of how quantum computers work. They're inherently random. You could do this with 1 qbit lmao.