70580865 : Do your own research? Do you actually use AI? Have you actually shown the new OpenAI voice model to anyone? People get their eyes lit up when they can talk to it. And here you have a company that brings voices to machines, starting with voice answering systems, and going into cars and you can imagine they’ll go into other things. Then you actually look at the management board, their credentials, their active YouTube and their CEO giving interviews and all points to giving machines around you a voice: Fridge, vacuum cleaner, washing machine, etc.. If you think this is a $2 service or opportunity, you are insane.

70580865 funny Elephant_7859 OP : So now you’ve added “speculative” to your $2 valuation. So just like I asked with the valuation, I ask again: What is speculative here?
Vision drives people. People make companies. Companies make products. Here you have a vision, great people, and a great product with little competition (I invite you to list competitors). Given all that, do you think the company stock is valued at $2? And this whole investment is speculative?
And what is speculative here? Do you not use the voice model? Does it not exist? Can you not understand that in two years max everything in your house will have a voice, including the tesla robot you own. And SoundHound does not need to produce a foundation model for each machine, they just need an interface for the machine internals, including an input-output interface. That’s it. What is speculative here?
Language, English language, is going to be the barrier and requirement to literally any product inside (and outside) your house, and machines will also converse with each other using English. This includes your Tesla robot and the washing machine.
With all that in mind, the only way to valuate the stock price at $2, and not be insane, is if you haven’t tried the new AI models. Try them. If afterwards you can’t see these models speaking to you from every device in your home in two years, you shouldn’t invest in tech.