2
1
$NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$ Where is the bear? Where is the bear!
Translated
$NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$ What is this!
Translated
$NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$ If it breaks 135 today, then it will take off.
Translated
3
tesla最大多头
commented on
$NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$ Does deepseek have any impact on NVIDIA? Yes, but it is a positive impact; do tariffs impact NVIDIA? Yes, but compared to other Industries, the impact on this supply-demand driven Industry is much smaller than in Consumer Electronics. So why was there such a harsh drop last week, with Semiconductors plummeting more than other Industries? If there isn't a harsher drop, how can the foolish short-sellers and silly retail investors be harvested?
Translated
2
2
tesla最大多头
liked
$NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$
Trump's tariff policies typically have geopolitical considerations, therefore they may target chip imports from specific countries or regions, rather than applying universally to all chips.
• Possible target countries:
• China: Most likely to become the primary target of tariff policies. The USA has long been cautious about competition with China in the technology and chip sectors.
• Countries with low-cost chip manufacturing: such as Vietnam, Malaysia, etc., these countries mainly produce low-end chips, which may be taxed due to low manufacturing costs.
• Are Taiwanese chips included?
• It is unlikely. Taiwan is an important strategic partner of the USA, Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) is a major supplier of advanced chips globally, the USA relies on TSMC to produce high-end chips like NVIDIA's H100 and A100.
• The USA is more encouraging Taiwan Semiconductor to invest in the USA (such as in Arizona factories), rather than imposing tariffs on Taiwanese chips.
Therefore, high-end chips (such as NVIDIA's AI GPU) may not be directly subject to tariffs, unless the policy objectives expand globally.
2. Tariffs on low-end chips
Trump may be more inclined to impose taxes on low-end chips, with the goal of:
• Protect low-end chip manufacturers in the USA (such as Texas Instruments, ON Semiconductor).
• Reduce reliance on low-cost chips from Asian countries (especially China).
Definition of low-end chips:
• Such as MCU (Microcontroller Unit), sensor chips, power...
Trump's tariff policies typically have geopolitical considerations, therefore they may target chip imports from specific countries or regions, rather than applying universally to all chips.
• Possible target countries:
• China: Most likely to become the primary target of tariff policies. The USA has long been cautious about competition with China in the technology and chip sectors.
• Countries with low-cost chip manufacturing: such as Vietnam, Malaysia, etc., these countries mainly produce low-end chips, which may be taxed due to low manufacturing costs.
• Are Taiwanese chips included?
• It is unlikely. Taiwan is an important strategic partner of the USA, Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) is a major supplier of advanced chips globally, the USA relies on TSMC to produce high-end chips like NVIDIA's H100 and A100.
• The USA is more encouraging Taiwan Semiconductor to invest in the USA (such as in Arizona factories), rather than imposing tariffs on Taiwanese chips.
Therefore, high-end chips (such as NVIDIA's AI GPU) may not be directly subject to tariffs, unless the policy objectives expand globally.
2. Tariffs on low-end chips
Trump may be more inclined to impose taxes on low-end chips, with the goal of:
• Protect low-end chip manufacturers in the USA (such as Texas Instruments, ON Semiconductor).
• Reduce reliance on low-cost chips from Asian countries (especially China).
Definition of low-end chips:
• Such as MCU (Microcontroller Unit), sensor chips, power...
Translated
12
1
1
$NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$ Flag 🚩
Translated
tesla最大多头
liked and commented on
$NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$ It seems like a short position has been opened, Block Orders can be placed to unwind over 900 yuan, let's wait for tomorrow.![]()
Translated
2
23
tesla最大多头
liked and commented on
$NVIDIA (NVDA.US)$ The outcome is still undecided for this short position, the short position is correct, but unfortunately the Block Orders are a bit misleading, holding on stubbornly. ![]()
Translated
1
13