Arrayfunction : oh God - they have made the people the product They are probably going to take a loss on the actual equipment in favor of prioritizing "de-identified" personal data they sell off to whoever wants to buy it while bullying people into thinking they don't have the rights Title 45 CFR Part 164.502 grants them I knew EHR's like epic were already pulling that, but devices to? jeez.
It is a far more sustainable business model though...... effectively aping subscription revenue, icky

Arrayfunction : about time why is it bad news though? is this a sin stock?

Arrayfunction Stock_Drift OP : my dumb self who didn't realize the plot banner wasn't showing up to date post market trends

Arrayfunction : Yeah, that's what I meant. I just made a mistake and misread the chart. Measure twice cut once was not properly employed

Arrayfunction : Do you know how those pre-arranged plans are "priced into" the overall share price like those people who tout that wonky "perfect market efficiency" idea?
At the most superficial level, it would be as simple as adding in a price drop from the increased sell volume. But I doubt it is that simple? Perhaps the sell volume's effect on price is dampened by increased buying volume from people looking to get the shares "on sale" per that 1st level? Or shareholders may feel more confident their interest will be better prioritized if the voting becomes less concentrated in the whims of a single person? Sort of a non-financial metric of how far on the "value" scale a stock goes?

Arrayfunction Trytosaveabit OP : Best bromance ever

Arrayfunction : Super cool to see how your mind works! As a fellow outsider to the industry, your emphasis on empiricism over dogma really stands out. I would say you should just write some code to scrape text and algo trade, but probably not worth the short time window before copycats pile in and ruin the unique advantage

Arrayfunction Trytosaveabit OP : Eh, I am a code monkey at my job at a pre-clinical CRO. The smart part happens before the monkeys get involved! Or  it is for me at least the few times I've authored the stats on papers.
Looking at the chaos of the giant landfill of data and having to pick the best way to extract any meaning takes way more brain power than writing the code to do it
Us monkeys can't do anything about the "garbage in, garbage out" axiom  - that's all for the thinkers to prevent

Arrayfunction ckm82 : Riding on Jag's coattails..... it only takes one full blown migraine lasting for 2 days straight to know relief starting in 10 minutes vs 30 minutes might mean the difference between setting to safe enough place to ride it out vs crumpled in a heap on the floor of the darkest corner you could find...just how much that difference worth will vary

Arrayfunction Jaguar8 OP : It's amazing to see you care about your patients enough to investigate beyond surface level on treatment response.  
Especially with how overworked doctors are - where if you are not directly reprimanded for going over the 15 allowed minutes per patient, you still know that extra time is often effectively pro bono.
Prioritizing patient care above all other BS can make such a tremendous difference in treatment outcome. I think folks like you deserve to be celebrated. I also sadly know those true performance metrics may as well not exist - just like any other aspect that can't be dumbed down to fit onto an Excel sheet of KPIs passed to the c-suite.
I'm certain all of your patients feel the same, even if they don't know how to articulate it. Thanks for being awesome

Arrayfunction : Anyone familiar with this field of devices? My doc said implant devices are a bit of a gamble (in the US) because insurance doesn't pay for battery replacement procedures. But also never seen the non-invasives do much