Because I myself have worked in this industry, I understand the situation well. The operation is conducted by targeting residents who can receive home visits three times a day. Among the target population, Parkinson's disease has a relatively high level of independence and a low level of dependence on care and nursing. Originally, it was explained that 1 or 2 visits were needed for 5%, but those who could not be accommodated occur at that probability. It is because it is not possible to allocate staff. It is more profitable to abandon it rather than to assign one more person. However, it can be said that as long as it is done according to the instructions of the doctor based on the system, there is no problem. However, the problem is the content going forward. How much additional payment for night visits is being claimed? I think it will be noticed by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare now that it has become a problem. What did they do to people who did not need visits in the middle of the night when they were supposed to be sleeping? If they take advantage of the dark gray area, it could result in fraudulent claims amounting to hundreds of millions of yen, and whether they can escape successfully or not is worth seeing. Personally, taking visits in the middle of the night is disadvantageous for their reputation.
This is not only a problem for Sanwells, but I think it will also affect other hospice-related stocks. However, for the others, there are a certain number of residents in the terminal stage of cancer (requiring 3 visits), so Sanwells is the most affected.

UAA is hitting well as expected

The first time was PTON.

There was a time when I preferred AMD over Intel for better image processing and because it was a familiar company. I hope we can have a long-term relationship.

I've tried it for the first time since today.