aGMC
赞了
$宝洁 (PG.US)$ $强生 (JNJ.US)$ $微软 (MSFT.US)$ $好市多 (COST.US)$ To me I think of proctor and gamble more as a way to preserve already attained wealth. To me that would be something like $50 to $100k i didn't want to risk much of and may still be some years from retirement.
If I was within maybe 5 years I'd maybe have even less than the $100k (for example) in something like a PG just to make up for inflation.
Anyways I'm wondering if someone like myself that's in accumulation mode should even have a stock like PG with any sizeable percentage.
I mean if I have 10 to 20 years till retirement, why not something like COST instead? Or heck even MSFT performing poorly should give a better return than Proctor and Gamble.
Even things like JNJ. Are those better suited to preserving already attained wealth?
I realize bonds were in the past, but now they don't yield that much.
Back in John Bogles days bonds could yield up to 10% with relatively low risk.
So I guess my main question is is it better to be mostly in growth type stocks if you have a long runway and not much of a portfolio?
Does holding 5% in Proctor and Gamble (one stock for example) do anything for someone sub 6 figures portfolio?
Or instead of a percentage in PG type stocks, wouldn't the sp500 index make more sense?
If I was within maybe 5 years I'd maybe have even less than the $100k (for example) in something like a PG just to make up for inflation.
Anyways I'm wondering if someone like myself that's in accumulation mode should even have a stock like PG with any sizeable percentage.
I mean if I have 10 to 20 years till retirement, why not something like COST instead? Or heck even MSFT performing poorly should give a better return than Proctor and Gamble.
Even things like JNJ. Are those better suited to preserving already attained wealth?
I realize bonds were in the past, but now they don't yield that much.
Back in John Bogles days bonds could yield up to 10% with relatively low risk.
So I guess my main question is is it better to be mostly in growth type stocks if you have a long runway and not much of a portfolio?
Does holding 5% in Proctor and Gamble (one stock for example) do anything for someone sub 6 figures portfolio?
Or instead of a percentage in PG type stocks, wouldn't the sp500 index make more sense?
9
aGMC
赞并评论了
上一篇精彩集锦
圣诞节和新年期间,股市大多保持中性。
此后,去年股市上涨了27%。在 omicron 在全球范围内大放异彩的条件下,我们还能指望市场会继续上涨吗?
好吧,即使是分析师也在努力弄清楚。高盛对该指数的预测与摩根士丹利的预测形成鲜明对比,摩根士丹利预计标准普尔500指数将上涨...
圣诞节和新年期间,股市大多保持中性。
此后,去年股市上涨了27%。在 omicron 在全球范围内大放异彩的条件下,我们还能指望市场会继续上涨吗?
好吧,即使是分析师也在努力弄清楚。高盛对该指数的预测与摩根士丹利的预测形成鲜明对比,摩根士丹利预计标准普尔500指数将上涨...
已翻译
![1月3日最活跃的股票期权:标准普尔500指数在2021年上涨近27%,下一步是什么?](https://ussnsimg.moomoo.com/5479284914135880356.png/thumb)
30
5