share_log

Is Asia Cement (China) Holdings Corporation (HKG:743) Popular Amongst Institutions?

Is Asia Cement (China) Holdings Corporation (HKG:743) Popular Amongst Institutions?

亚洲水泥(中国)控股公司(HKG: 743)在机构中受欢迎吗?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/30 19:10

The big shareholder groups in Asia Cement (China) Holdings Corporation (HKG:743) have power over the company. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

亚洲水泥(中国)控股公司(HKG: 743)的大股东集团对该公司拥有控制权。大公司通常以机构为股东,我们通常会看到内部人士拥有小型公司的股份。我们还倾向于看到以前公开拥有的公司的内部所有权较低。

Asia Cement (China) Holdings isn't enormous, but it's not particularly small either. It has a market capitalization of HK$6.7b, which means it would generally expect to see some institutions on the share registry. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions own shares in the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Asia Cement (China) Holdings.

亚洲水泥(中国)控股规模不大,但也不是特别小。它的市值为67亿港元,这意味着它通常预计会有一些机构进入股票登记处。下文我们对公司所有权的分析显示,机构拥有该公司的股份。我们可以放大不同的所有权群体,以了解有关亚洲水泥(中国)控股的更多信息。

View our latest analysis for Asia Cement (China) Holdings

查看我们对亚洲水泥(中国)控股公司的最新分析

SEHK:743 Ownership Breakdown June 30th 2022
SEHK: 743 股权明细 2022年6月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Asia Cement (China) Holdings?

关于亚洲水泥(中国)控股公司,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that Asia Cement (China) Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Asia Cement (China) Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,亚洲水泥(中国)控股公司确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司的很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看亚洲水泥(中国)控股公司的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

SEHK:743 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 30th 2022
SEHK: 743 2022年6月30日收益及收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Asia Cement (China) Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is Asia Cement Corporation, with ownership of 72%. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Invesco Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 2.8% of common stock, and Franklin Resources, Inc. holds about 1.6% of the company stock.

对冲基金在亚洲水泥(中国)控股公司的股份不多。该公司的最大股东是亚洲水泥公司,所有权为72%。这意味着他们对公司的未来拥有多数权益控制权。景顺有限公司是第二大股东,拥有2.8%的普通股,富兰克林资源公司持有该公司约1.6%的股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有一些分析师对这只股票的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Asia Cement (China) Holdings

亚洲水泥(中国)控股公司的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Asia Cement (China) Holdings Corporation. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It seems the board members have no more than HK$21m worth of shares in the HK$6.7b company. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有亚洲水泥(中国)控股公司不到1%的股份。但是,他们可能会通过我们尚未采用的公司结构获得间接利益。看来董事会成员在这家67亿港元的公司中持有的股份不超过2100万港元。我们通常希望看到董事会投入更多资金。但是,可能值得检查这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Asia Cement (China) Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

亚洲水泥(中国)控股公司拥有 18% 的所有权,大众对亚洲水泥(中国)控股有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

It appears to us that public companies own 72% of Asia Cement (China) Holdings. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

在我们看来,上市公司拥有亚洲水泥(中国)控股公司72%的股份。很难肯定地说,但这表明它们将商业利益交织在一起。这可能是战略利害关系,因此值得关注这个领域的所有权变动。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Asia Cement (China) Holdings you should be aware of.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。一个很好的例子:我们已经发现了亚洲水泥(中国)控股的两个警告信号,你应该注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发