share_log

Individual Investors Are HNA Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600751) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥696m Last Week

Individual Investors Are HNA Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600751) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥696m Last Week

个人投资者是海航科技公司, Ltd. 's(SHSE: 600751)最大的所有者,在上周市值上涨6.96亿人民币后获得了回报
Simply Wall St ·  2023/02/16 18:30

To get a sense of who is truly in control of HNA Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:600751), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 55% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

了解谁真正控制了海航科技公司, Ltd.(SHSE: 600751),了解企业的所有权结构很重要。个人投资者持有55%的股份,拥有公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最大收益(或损失最大)。

Clearly, individual investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥696m last week.

显然,在上周该公司的市值上涨了6.96亿元人民币之后,个人投资者受益最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of HNA TechnologyLtd.

在下图中,我们放大了海航科技有限公司的不同所有权集团。

View our latest analysis for HNA TechnologyLtd

查看我们对海航科技有限公司的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600751 Ownership Breakdown February 16th 2023
SHSE: 600751 2023 年 2 月 16 日所有权明细

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HNA TechnologyLtd?

关于海航科技有限公司,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in HNA TechnologyLtd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see HNA TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者持有海航科技有限公司相当多的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者提供的假定验证。他们也是,有时候也会犯错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,他们总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有成长历史的公司来说,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到海航科技有限公司的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总会有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600751 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 16th 2023
SHSE: 600751 2023 年 2 月 16 日收益和收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in HNA TechnologyLtd. The company's largest shareholder is Hainan Traffic Administration Holding Co., Ltd., with ownership of 29%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 14% and 0.7% of the stock.

对冲基金在海航科技有限公司的股份不多。该公司的最大股东是海南交通管理局控股有限公司,拥有29%的所有权。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约14%和0.7%的股票。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 11 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我们的所有权数据时,我们发现11位大股东共同拥有的股份不到50%,这意味着没有一个人拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of HNA TechnologyLtd

海航科技有限公司的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我们的数据无法证实董事会成员亲自持有股份。董事会成员不持有至少部分个人持股的情况很少见,因此我们的数据可能存在缺陷。一个不错的下一步是检查首席执行官的薪水是多少。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 55% stake in HNA TechnologyLtd, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有海航科技有限公司55%的巨额股份,这表明这是一只相当受欢迎的股票。这种所有权规模赋予了公众投资者一定的集体权力。他们可以而且可能确实会影响有关高管薪酬、股息政策和拟议业务收购的决策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 29%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有29%的已发行股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司有兴趣,则应在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with HNA TechnologyLtd (including 1 which is significant) .

虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他更为重要的因素。为此,你应该了解 2 个警告标志 我们发现了HNA TechnologyLtd(包括 1 个意义重大的公司)。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

当然, 你可能会在其他地方找到一笔不错的投资。 所以来看看这个 免费的 有趣的公司名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧? 取得联系 直接和我们联系。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是一般性的。 我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未将最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简而言之,华尔街对上述任何股票都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发