C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI) Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 50% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 31%
C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI) Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 50% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 31%
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significant control over C3.ai by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 43% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- 12% of C3.ai is held by insiders
- 散户投资者对 C3.ai 的严格控制意味着公众更有权影响管理和治理相关决策
- 43% 的业务由前 25 名股东持有
- C3.ai 的12%由内部人士持有
Every investor in C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is retail investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
C3.ai, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:AI)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。持有公司股份最多的集团是散户投资者,准确地说约为50%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Meanwhile, institutions make up 31% of the company's shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.
同时,机构占公司股东的31%。机构通常拥有更成熟公司的股份,而内部人士拥有相当多的小型公司的情况并不少见。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about C3.ai.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于 C3.ai 的什么。
Check out our latest analysis for C3.ai
看看我们对 C3.ai 的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About C3.ai?
关于 C3.ai,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
C3.ai already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of C3.ai, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
C3.ai 在股票注册表上已经有机构了。事实上,他们在公司拥有可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的可信度。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像每个人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时卖出一只股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得一看看 C3.ai 过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
C3.ai is not owned by hedge funds. With a 8.4% stake, CEO Thomas Siebel is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.1% and 7.7% of the stock.
C3.ai 不归对冲基金所有。首席执行官托马斯·西贝尔持有8.4%的股份,是最大的股东。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约8.1%和7.7%的股票。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
深入研究我们的所有权数据表明,前25名股东总共持有不到登记册的一半,这表明一大批小股东没有单一股东占多数。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of C3.ai
C3.ai 的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in C3.ai, Inc.. Insiders own US$290m worth of shares in the US$2.5b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息表明,内部人士持有 C3.ai, Inc. 的大量股份。内部人士拥有这家价值25亿美元的公司价值2.9亿美元的股份。这很有意义。大多数人会说,这表明了与股东的良好一致性,尤其是在如此规模的公司中。您可以点击此处查看这些内部人士是在买入还是卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 50% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over C3.ai. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众拥有50%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成,对 C3.ai 有一定程度的影响力。虽然这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.7%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有该公司7.7%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过独立的私人公司持有上市公司的股份权益。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for C3.ai (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.
我觉得看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了 C3.ai 的 3 个警告标志 (1 有点令人担忧),你应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这篇文章 免费的 分析师预测报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧? 取得联系 直接和我们联系。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是一般性的。 我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未将最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简而言之,华尔街对上述任何股票都没有头寸。