share_log

Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE:NUS) Shares Could Be 21% Below Their Intrinsic Value Estimate

Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE:NUS) Shares Could Be 21% Below Their Intrinsic Value Estimate

Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:NUS)的股价可能比其内在价值估计值低21%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/08/12 09:26

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Nu Skin Enterprises' estimated fair value is US$31.88 based on 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity
  • Current share price of US$25.19 suggests Nu Skin Enterprises is potentially 21% undervalued
  • The US$31.50 analyst price target for NUS is 1.2% less than our estimate of fair value
  • 根据两阶段股权自由现金流计算,Nu Skin Enterprises的估计公允价值为31.88美元
  • 目前股价为25.19美元,这表明Nu Skin Enterprises的估值可能被低估了21%
  • 新加坡国立大学分析师的目标股价为31.50美元,比我们对公允价值的估计低1.2%

Does the August share price for Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE:NUS) reflect what it's really worth? Today, we will estimate the stock's intrinsic value by taking the expected future cash flows and discounting them to their present value. This will be done using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Models like these may appear beyond the comprehension of a lay person, but they're fairly easy to follow.

Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:NUS)8月份的股价是否反映了它的真正价值?今天,我们将通过计算预期的未来现金流并将其折现为现值来估算股票的内在价值。这将使用贴现现金流 (DCF) 模型来完成。像这样的模型可能看起来超出了非专业人士的理解范围,但它们很容易理解。

Remember though, that there are many ways to estimate a company's value, and a DCF is just one method. Anyone interested in learning a bit more about intrinsic value should have a read of the Simply Wall St analysis model.

但请记住,估算公司价值的方法有很多,而差价合约只是一种方法。任何有兴趣进一步了解内在价值的人都应该读一读 Simply Wall St 分析模型。

Check out our latest analysis for Nu Skin Enterprises

看看我们对 Nu Skin Enterprises 的最新分析

The Model

该模型

We are going to use a two-stage DCF model, which, as the name states, takes into account two stages of growth. The first stage is generally a higher growth period which levels off heading towards the terminal value, captured in the second 'steady growth' period. To begin with, we have to get estimates of the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.

我们将使用两阶段的DCF模型,顾名思义,该模型考虑了两个增长阶段。第一阶段通常是较高的增长期,在第二个 “稳步增长” 时期逐渐趋于平稳,最终值是第二个 “稳定增长” 时期。首先,我们必须估算出未来十年的现金流。在可能的情况下,我们会使用分析师的估计值,但是当这些估计值不可用时,我们会从最新的估计值或报告的价值中推断出之前的自由现金流(FCF)。我们假设自由现金流萎缩的公司将减缓其萎缩速度,而自由现金流不断增长的公司在此期间的增长率将放缓。我们这样做是为了反映早期增长的放缓幅度往往比后来的几年更大。

Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we need to discount the sum of these future cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate:

通常,我们假设今天的一美元比未来一美元更有价值,因此我们需要对这些未来现金流的总和进行折价才能得出现值估计:

10-year free cash flow (FCF) forecast

10 年自由现金流 (FCF) 预测

2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033
Levered FCF ($, Millions) US$111.5m US$109.3m US$108.6m US$108.7m US$109.6m US$110.8m US$112.5m US$114.3m US$116.4m US$118.6m
Growth Rate Estimate Source Analyst x1 Est @ -1.93% Est @ -0.71% Est @ 0.15% Est @ 0.75% Est @ 1.17% Est @ 1.46% Est @ 1.67% Est @ 1.81% Est @ 1.91%
Present Value ($, Millions) Discounted @ 8.4% US$103 US$93.0 US$85.2 US$78.7 US$73.1 US$68.2 US$63.8 US$59.8 US$56.2 US$52.8
2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033
Levered FCF(美元,百万) 1.115 亿美元 1.093 亿美元 1.086 亿美元 1.087 亿美元 1.096 亿美元 1.108 亿美元 1.125 亿美元 1.143 亿美元 1.164 亿美元 1.186 亿美元
增长率估算来源 分析师 x1 Est @ -1.93% Est @ -0.71% Est @ 0.15% Est @ 0.75% 东部时间 @ 1.17% Est @ 1.46% Est @ 1.67% Est @ 1.81% Est @ 1.91%
现值(美元,百万)折扣 @ 8.4% 103 美元 93.0 美元 85.2 美元 78.7 美元 73.1 美元 68.2 美元 63.8 美元 59.8 美元 56.2 美元 52.8 美元

("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)
Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = US$734m

(“Est” = Simply Wall St估计的FCF增长率)
10年期现金流(PVCF)的现值 = 7.34 亿美元

After calculating the present value of future cash flows in the initial 10-year period, we need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all future cash flows beyond the first stage. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of a country's GDP growth. In this case we have used the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield (2.2%) to estimate future growth. In the same way as with the 10-year 'growth' period, we discount future cash flows to today's value, using a cost of equity of 8.4%.

在计算了最初10年期未来现金流的现值之后,我们需要计算终端价值,该终端价值考虑了第一阶段之后的所有未来现金流。出于多种原因,使用了非常保守的增长率,不能超过一个国家的GDP增长率。在本例中,我们使用了10年期政府债券收益率的5年平均值(2.2%)来估计未来的增长。与10年 “增长” 期一样,我们将未来的现金流折现为今天的价值,权益成本为8.4%。

Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2033 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = US$119m× (1 + 2.2%) ÷ (8.4%– 2.2%) = US$1.9b

终端价值 (TV)= FCF2033 × (1 + g) ⇒ (r — g) = 1.19 亿美元× (1 + 2.2%) ⇒ (8.4% — 2.2%) = 19亿美元

Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= US$1.9b÷ ( 1 + 8.4%)10= US$859m

终端价值的现值 (PVTV)= 电视/ (1 + r)10= 19亿美元⇒ (1 + 8.4%)10= 8.59 亿美元

The total value, or equity value, is then the sum of the present value of the future cash flows, which in this case is US$1.6b. In the final step we divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of US$25.2, the company appears a touch undervalued at a 21% discount to where the stock price trades currently. The assumptions in any calculation have a big impact on the valuation, so it is better to view this as a rough estimate, not precise down to the last cent.

因此,总价值或权益价值就是未来现金流现值的总和,在本例中为16亿美元。在最后一步中,我们将权益价值除以已发行股票的数量。相对于目前的25.2美元的股价,该公司的估值似乎略微被低估了,比目前的股价折扣了21%。任何计算中的假设都会对估值产生重大影响,因此最好将其视为粗略的估计,而不是精确到最后一美分。

dcf
NYSE:NUS Discounted Cash Flow August 12th 2023
纽约证券交易所:2023年8月12日新加坡国立大学贴现现金流

The Assumptions

假设

The calculation above is very dependent on two assumptions. The first is the discount rate and the other is the cash flows. Part of investing is coming up with your own evaluation of a company's future performance, so try the calculation yourself and check your own assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Nu Skin Enterprises as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 8.4%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.256. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.

上面的计算在很大程度上取决于两个假设。第一个是贴现率,另一个是现金流量。投资的一部分是自己对公司未来表现的评估,所以请自己尝试计算并检查自己的假设。DCF也没有考虑一个行业可能的周期性,也没有考虑公司未来的资本需求,因此它没有全面反映公司的潜在业绩。鉴于我们将Nu Skin Enterprises视为潜在股东,因此权益成本被用作贴现率,而不是考虑债务的资本成本(或加权平均资本成本,WACC)。在此计算中,我们使用了8.4%,这是基于杠杆测试版1.256。Beta是衡量股票与整个市场相比波动性的指标。我们的beta来自全球可比公司的行业平均Beta值,施加的限制在0.8到2.0之间,对于稳定的业务来说,这是一个合理的区间。

SWOT Analysis for Nu Skin Enterprises

Nu Skin 企业的 SWOT 分析

Strength
力量
  • Debt is well covered by earnings.
  • 债务可以很好地由收益支付。
  • Dividend is in the top 25% of dividend payers in the market.
  • 股息在市场上名列前25%的股息支付者。
  • Dividend information for NUS.
  • 新加坡国立大学的股息信息。
Weakness
弱点
  • Earnings declined over the past year.
  • 在过去的一年中,收益有所下降。
Opportunity
机会
  • Annual earnings are forecast to grow faster than the American market.
  • 预计年收入的增长速度将快于美国市场。
  • Good value based on P/E ratio and estimated fair value.
  • 根据市盈率和估计的公允价值,物有所值。
Threat
威胁
  • Debt is not well covered by operating cash flow.
  • 运营现金流无法很好地覆盖债务。
  • Dividends are not covered by earnings and cashflows.
  • 股息不在收益和现金流的覆盖范围内。
  • Annual revenue is forecast to grow slower than the American market.
  • 预计年收入的增长速度将低于美国市场。
  • Is NUS well equipped to handle threats?
  • 新加坡国立大学有能力应对威胁吗?

Moving On:

继续前进:

Although the valuation of a company is important, it ideally won't be the sole piece of analysis you scrutinize for a company. The DCF model is not a perfect stock valuation tool. Rather it should be seen as a guide to "what assumptions need to be true for this stock to be under/overvalued?" If a company grows at a different rate, or if its cost of equity or risk free rate changes sharply, the output can look very different. Can we work out why the company is trading at a discount to intrinsic value? For Nu Skin Enterprises, we've put together three pertinent factors you should look at:

尽管公司的估值很重要,但理想情况下,它不是你为公司仔细审查的唯一分析。DCF模型不是一个完美的股票估值工具。相反,它应该被视为 “这只股票需要哪些假设才能被低估/高估?” 的指南如果一家公司以不同的速度增长,或者其股本成本或无风险利率急剧变化,则产出可能会大不相同。我们能否弄清楚为什么公司的交易价格低于内在价值?对于 Nu Skin Enterprises,我们汇总了你应该考虑的三个相关因素:

  1. Risks: For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Nu Skin Enterprises (1 can't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
  2. Future Earnings: How does NUS's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart.
  3. Other Solid Businesses: Low debt, high returns on equity and good past performance are fundamental to a strong business. Why not explore our interactive list of stocks with solid business fundamentals to see if there are other companies you may not have considered!
  1. 风险: 例如,我们发现了 Nu Skin Enterprises 有 2 个 (1 不容忽视!)在这里投资之前,你应该注意这一点。
  2. 未来收益: 与同行和整个市场相比,新加坡国立大学的增长率如何?通过与我们的免费分析师增长预期图表互动,深入了解未来几年的分析师共识数字。
  3. 其他稳健的业务: 低债务、高股本回报率和良好的过往表现是强劲业务的基础。为什么不浏览我们的互动式具有坚实商业基础的股票清单,看看是否还有其他公司你可能没有考虑过!

PS. The Simply Wall St app conducts a discounted cash flow valuation for every stock on the NYSE every day. If you want to find the calculation for other stocks just search here.

PS。Simply Wall St应用程序每天对纽约证券交易所的每只股票进行折扣现金流估值。如果您想找到其他股票的计算方法,请在此处搜索。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗? 取得联系 直接和我们在一起。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。 我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街在上述任何股票中都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发