CONX Corp. (NASDAQ:CONX) Insiders Have Significant Skin in the Game With 69% Ownership
CONX Corp. (NASDAQ:CONX) Insiders Have Significant Skin in the Game With 69% Ownership
Key Insights
主要见解
- CONX's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- The largest shareholder of the company is Charles Ergen with a 69% stake
- 11% of CONX is held by Institutions
- CONX的重大内部人所有权表明公司扩张的内在利益
- 该公司的最大股东是查尔斯·尔根,持有69%的股份
- CONX公司11%的股份由机构持有
A look at the shareholders of CONX Corp. (NASDAQ:CONX) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 69% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看CONX公司(纳斯达克代码:CONX)的股东就能知道哪个集团最有权势。我们可以看到,个人内部人士拥有公司的最大份额,拥有69%的股份。换句话说,该集团将从他们对公司的投资中获得最大(或损失最大)。
So it follows, every decision made by insiders of CONX regarding the company's future would be crucial to them.
因此,CONX内部人士就公司未来做出的每一项决定都将对他们至关重要。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CONX.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于CONX的什么。
See our latest analysis for CONX
查看我们对CONX的最新分析
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20230814/0-060dfc50e59c0b734f82f8fff8b2182b-0-0b5102ef515a5581667ccdf7663cbf1e.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CONX?
关于CONX,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与经常跟踪的指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常确实会考虑收购被纳入相关基准指数的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in CONX. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at CONX's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在CONX拥有相当多的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这只股票,他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,下面是CONX的盈利历史值得一看。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20230814/0-060dfc50e59c0b734f82f8fff8b2182b-1-e24ffe873f2277910a5418131d96c088.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in CONX. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Charles Ergen (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 69% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.5% and 2.7% of the stock.
我们注意到,对冲基金在CONX没有有意义的投资。根据我们的数据,我们推断最大的股东是Charles Ergen(他也拥有最高管理层的头衔),持有69%的流通股。当内部人持有公司大量股份时,这通常被认为是一个好兆头,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到公司内部人扮演关键利益相关者的角色。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东分别持有约5.5%和2.7%的股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。我们的信息显示,分析师没有对该股进行任何报道,因此它可能鲜为人知。
Insider Ownership Of CONX
CONX的内部人所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同国家对内部人的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算数的。公司管理层管理企业,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部人持股是积极的,因为它可以表明董事会与其他股东很好地结盟。然而,在某些情况下,太多的权力集中在这个群体中。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of CONX Corp.. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a US$153m stake in this US$222m business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,内部人士拥有CONX公司一半以上的股份。这让他们有效地控制了公司。因此,他们在这项价值2.22亿美元的业务中拥有1.53亿美元的股份。大多数人会辩称,这是积极的,表明了与股东的强烈一致。你可以点击这里,看看这些内部人士是一直在买入还是卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CONX. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有19%股权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对CONX有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
接下来的步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for CONX that you should be aware of before investing here.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们发现CONX的3个警告标志在这里投资之前你应该意识到这一点。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
当然了这可能不是最值得购买的股票。。所以让我们来看看这个免费 免费有趣的公司名单。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。