share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Stem, Inc.'s (NYSE:STEM) Recent 14% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Stem, Inc.'s (NYSE:STEM) Recent 14% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

机构所有者可能会像Stem, Inc. 一样采取戏剧性的行动s(纽约证券交易所代码:STEM)最近下跌14%加剧了一年的亏损
Simply Wall St ·  2023/10/26 07:05

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Stem implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 23 shareholders
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 机构在Stem的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价有重大影响
  • 51% 的业务由前 23 名股东持有
  • 内部人士最近的购买

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Stem, Inc. (NYSE:STEM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 72% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解谁真正控制了Stem, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:STEM),了解企业的所有权结构非常重要。机构持有72%的股份,拥有该公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最大收益(或损失最大)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 14% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 77% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Stem, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

上周,机构投资者的持股价值下降了14%。这些投资者可能特别担心当前的亏损,这加上股东一年亏损77%。机构通常被称为 “市场推动者”,在影响任何股票的价格动态方面拥有巨大的力量。因此,如果下跌趋势继续下去,机构可能会面临出售Stem的压力,这可能会对个人投资者产生负面影响。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stem.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Stem的哪些信息。

See our latest analysis for Stem

查看我们对 Stem 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:STEM Ownership Breakdown October 26th 2023
纽约证券交易所:STEM 所有权明细 2023 年 10 月 26 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stem?

关于STEM,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Stem. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Stem, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所见,机构投资者在Stem中拥有相当多的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得一看Stem过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:STEM Earnings and Revenue Growth October 26th 2023
纽约证券交易所:STEM 收益和收入增长 2023 年 10 月 26 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Stem. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 8.8%. The second and third largest shareholders are BlackRock, Inc. and Schroder Investment Management Limited, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.8%.

由于机构投资者拥有一半以上的已发行股票,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。对冲基金在Stem的股份不多。该公司的最大股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,拥有8.8%的所有权。第二和第三大股东是贝莱德公司和施罗德投资管理有限公司,其股份数量与他们的名义相同,为6.8%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 23 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

从股东登记处可以看出,51%的所有权由前23名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东拥有所有权的多数股权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Stem

Stem 的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Stem, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$18m worth of the US$494m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有Stem, Inc.的股份。作为个人,内部人士共同拥有这家价值4.94亿美元的公司的价值1800万美元。这至少显示出一定的对齐性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司25%的股份,因此不容易被忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司的政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Stem , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我觉得看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。例如,以永远存在的投资风险幽灵为例。 我们已经确定了 3 个警告信号 使用 Stem,了解它们应该是你投资过程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底 这是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者的表现如何。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗? 取得联系 直接和我们在一起。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。 我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街在上述任何股票中都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发