share_log

With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Fastenal Company (NASDAQ:FAST) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Fastenal Company (NASDAQ:FAST) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

Fastenal Company(纳斯达克股票代码:FAST)拥有81%的股份所有权,主要由机构所有者主导
Simply Wall St ·  2023/11/08 06:49

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Fastenal's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 机构所有权居高不下意味着Fastenal的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 前 25 名股东拥有公司 49% 的股份
  • 分析师的预测以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls Fastenal Company (NASDAQ:FAST), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Fastenal Company(纳斯达克股票代码:FAST),那么你必须看看其股票注册的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为81%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则亏损最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

鉴于其可支配的资金和研究能力巨大,机构所有权往往具有很大的份量,对于个人投资者而言尤其如此。因此,向公司投资的大量机构资金通常被视为积极属性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Fastenal.

在下图中,我们放大了Fastenal的不同所有权组。

View our latest analysis for Fastenal

查看我们对 Fastenal 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:FAST Ownership Breakdown November 8th 2023
纳斯达克:2023 年 11 月 8 日快速所有权明细

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fastenal?

关于Fastenal,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Fastenal already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Fastenal's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Fastenal已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司的可观股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是,就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,它们总是有处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。对于没有成长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Fastenal的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:FAST Earnings and Revenue Growth November 8th 2023
纳斯达克:收益和收入快速增长 2023 年 11 月 8 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Fastenal is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.9% and 4.8% of the stock.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。Fastenal不归对冲基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc. 目前是该公司的最大股东,持有12%的已发行股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约7.9%和4.8%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我们的所有权数据时,我们发现25位大股东共同拥有的股份不到50%,这意味着没有一个人拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Fastenal

Fastenal 的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Fastenal Company in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$62m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己的名义拥有Fastenal Company不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部人士拥有该公司的很大一部分股份会令人惊讶。尽管他们的持股量不到1%,但我们可以看到,董事会成员共同拥有价值6200万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到董事会成员拥有股票,但可能值得检查这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Fastenal. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Fastenal拥有19%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对Fastenal有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Fastenal better, we need to consider many other factors.

对于拥有公司股份的不同群体,总是值得考虑的。但是为了更好地了解Fastenal,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地潜水 了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以在此找到历史收入和收益 详细图表

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底 这是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者的表现如何。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗? 取得联系 直接和我们在一起。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。 我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街在上述任何股票中都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发