Additional Considerations Required While Assessing Marcus' (NYSE:MCS) Strong Earnings
Additional Considerations Required While Assessing Marcus' (NYSE:MCS) Strong Earnings
The Marcus Corporation's (NYSE:MCS) robust earnings report didn't manage to move the market for its stock. Our analysis suggests that shareholders have noticed something concerning in the numbers.
马库斯公司(纽约证券交易所代码:MCS)强劲的收益报告未能推动其股票市场。我们的分析表明,股东们已经注意到了一些令人担忧的数字。
Check out our latest analysis for Marcus
查看我们对Marcus的最新分析
The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit
不寻常物品对利润的影响
Importantly, our data indicates that Marcus' profit received a boost of US$5.9m in unusual items, over the last year. While it's always nice to have higher profit, a large contribution from unusual items sometimes dampens our enthusiasm. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. Assuming those unusual items don't show up again in the current year, we'd thus expect profit to be weaker next year (in the absence of business growth, that is).
重要的是,我们的数据表明,在过去的一年中,Marcus的异常项目利润增加了590万美元。虽然获得更高的利润总是件好事,但来自不寻常物品的巨额贡献有时会抑制我们的热情。当我们分析全球绝大多数上市公司时,我们发现重要的不寻常项目通常不会重演。而且,毕竟,这正是会计术语的含义。假设这些不寻常的项目在本年度不会再次出现,因此我们预计明年的利润将疲软(也就是说,在业务没有增长的情况下)。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
这可能会让你想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看根据他们的估计描绘未来盈利能力的交互式图表。
Our Take On Marcus' Profit Performance
我们对马库斯利润表现的看法
Arguably, Marcus' statutory earnings have been distorted by unusual items boosting profit. Because of this, we think that it may be that Marcus' statutory profits are better than its underlying earnings power. But the happy news is that, while acknowledging we have to look beyond the statutory numbers, those numbers are still improving, with EPS growing at a very high rate over the last year. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. So if you'd like to dive deeper into this stock, it's crucial to consider any risks it's facing. In terms of investment risks, we've identified 2 warning signs with Marcus, and understanding these should be part of your investment process.
可以说,提高利润的不寻常项目扭曲了马库斯的法定收入。因此,我们认为马库斯的法定利润可能优于其潜在的盈利能力。但令人欣慰的是,尽管我们承认我们必须将目光投向法定数字之外,但这些数字仍在改善,去年每股收益以非常高的速度增长。本文的目的是评估我们可以多大程度地依靠法定收益来反映公司的潜力,但还有很多需要考虑的地方。因此,如果你想更深入地研究这只股票,那么考虑它面临的任何风险至关重要。在投资风险方面,我们已经向马库斯发现了两个警告信号,了解这些信号应该是您投资过程的一部分。
Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of Marcus' profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying.
今天,我们放大了单个数据点,以更好地了解马库斯利润的性质。但是,如果你能够将注意力集中在细节上,总会有更多值得发现的地方。例如,许多人认为高股本回报率表明商业经济状况良好,而另一些人则喜欢 “追随资金”,寻找内部人士正在购买的股票。因此,你可能希望看到这批拥有高股本回报率的免费公司,或者这份内部人士正在购买的股票清单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。