Rongan Property Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:000517) 5.2% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Private Companies Who Own 48% as Well as Insiders
Rongan Property Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:000517) 5.2% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Private Companies Who Own 48% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significant control over Rongan PropertyLtd by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 77% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Insiders own 29% of Rongan PropertyLtd
- 私营公司对荣安地产有限公司的重大控制意味着公众有更大的权力影响管理和治理相关决策
- 77%的业务由前2名股东持有
- 业内人士拥有荣安地产有限公司29%的股份
If you want to know who really controls Rongan Property Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:000517), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制着荣安置业有限公司, Ltd.(深圳证券交易所代码:000517),那么你得看看其股票注册表的构成。而占有最大份额的集团是拥有48%所有权的私营公司。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Private companies gained the most after market cap touched CN¥9.0b last week, while insiders who own 29% also benefitted.
上周市值触及90亿元人民币后,私人公司涨幅最大,而持有29%的内部人士也从中受益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Rongan PropertyLtd.
在下图中,我们放大了Rongan PropertyLtd的不同所有权组。
View our latest analysis for Rongan PropertyLtd
查看我们对 Rongan PropertyLtd 的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rongan PropertyLtd?
机构所有权告诉我们关于荣安地产有限公司的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
We can see that Rongan PropertyLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Rongan PropertyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到,Rongan PropertyLtd确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像每个人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,它们总是有处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。对于没有成长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Rongan PropertyLtd的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总有更多。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Rongan PropertyLtd. Rongan Group Holding Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 48% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 29% and 1.9% of the stock.
对冲基金在荣安地产有限公司的股份不多。融安集团控股有限公司目前是最大股东,持有48%的已发行股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约29%和1.9%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现前两位股东共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有影响公司决策的巨大权力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。
Insider Ownership Of Rongan PropertyLtd
荣安地产有限公司的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Rongan Property Co.,Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥9.0b, and insiders have CN¥2.6b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有融安地产有限公司的合理比例。,有限公司。它的市值仅为90亿元人民币,而内部人士以自己的名义持有价值26亿元人民币的股票。这非常重要。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Rongan PropertyLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
凭借18%的所有权,普通大众(主要由个人投资者组成)对Rongan PropertyLtd拥有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以使政策决策向他们倾斜,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 48%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有该公司48%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过单独的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Rongan PropertyLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Rongan PropertyLtd (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
对于拥有公司股份的不同群体,总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解荣安房地产有限公司,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了 Rongan PropertyLtd 的 3 个警告标志(1 个有点令人担忧!)在这里投资之前,你应该意识到这一点。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我们免费收集的具有良好财务状况的有趣潜在客户。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。