Public Companies Invested in Joyvio Food Co., Ltd (SZSE:300268) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥388m Market Cap Decline
Public Companies Invested in Joyvio Food Co., Ltd (SZSE:300268) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥388m Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
关键见解
- Joyvio Food's significant public companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 52% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- Joyvio Food拥有大量上市公司所有权表明,关键决策受到大型公众股东的影响
- 52% 的业务由前三名股东持有
- 所有权研究与过去的表现数据相结合,可以帮助人们更好地了解股票的机会
If you want to know who really controls Joyvio Food Co., Ltd (SZSE:300268), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 46% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制了Joyvio食品有限公司(SZSE:300268),那么你必须看看其股票注册的构成。而占有最大份额的集团是拥有46%所有权的上市公司。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And following last week's 16% decline in share price, public companies suffered the most losses.
继上周股价下跌16%之后,上市公司遭受的损失最大。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Joyvio Food, beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下表开始,更深入地研究Joyvio Food的每种类型的所有者。
Check out our latest analysis for Joyvio Food
查看我们对Joyvio Food的最新分析
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20231215/0-19035a74adf0ee5ca4e69218e25d8536-0-c67df234a5bc0741ab9e2270151837a4.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Joyvio Food?
关于Joyvio Food,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
Joyvio Food already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Joyvio Food's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Joyvio Food已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司的可观股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像每个人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,它们总是有处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速卖出股票。对于没有成长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Joyvio Food的历史收入和收入,但请记住,故事中总有更多。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20231215/0-19035a74adf0ee5ca4e69218e25d8536-1-9e1c37a47fe9c66a5eecbe7218406899.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Joyvio Food. The company's largest shareholder is Legend Holdings Corporation, with ownership of 46%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 3.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.8% by the third-largest shareholder.
我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Joyvio Food进行有意义的投资。该公司的最大股东是联想控股公司,所有权为46%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约3.4%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有2.8%的所有权。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前三名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。
Insider Ownership Of Joyvio Food
Joyvio Food 的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Joyvio Food Co., Ltd. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥2.1b, and insiders have CN¥90m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有Joyvio Food Co., Ltd的部分股份。该公司的市值仅为21亿元人民币,而内部人士以自己的名义拥有价值9000万元人民币的股票。有人会说这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但是,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司40%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响有利于他们的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
It appears to us that public companies own 46% of Joyvio Food. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
在我们看来,上市公司拥有Joyvio Food46%的股份。我们无法确定,但这很可能是战略利益。这些企业可能相似,也可能合作。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Joyvio Food you should be aware of, and 2 of them are a bit concerning.
尽管值得考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。一个很好的例子:我们发现了 Joyvio Food 的 3 个警告信号,你应该注意,其中 2 个有点令人担忧。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,来看看这份免费的有趣公司名单吧。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。