share_log

Tang Tong Qi-House Holdings Limited's (HKG:8395) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 70%last Week

Tang Tong Qi-House Holdings Limited's (HKG:8395) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 70%last Week

唐童启屋控股有限公司(HKG: 8395)首席执行官是最看涨的内部人士,他们的股票价值上周上涨了70%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/12/18 17:44

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Qi-House Holdings' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • Tang Tong owns 51% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 内部人士似乎对Qi-House Holdings的增长有既得利益,从他们庞大的所有权可以看出
  • 唐通拥有该公司 51% 的股份
  • 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以让人们对企业前景有深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls Qi-House Holdings Limited (HKG:8395), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 64% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Qi-House Holdings Limited(HKG: 8395),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,个别内部人士拥有公司的大部分股份,所有权为64%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 70% gain.

结果,内部人士是上周70%涨幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Qi-House Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Qi-House Holdings的每种类型的所有者。

Check out our latest analysis for Qi-House Holdings

查看我们对Qi-House Holdings的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:8395 Ownership Breakdown December 18th 2023
SEHK: 8395 所有权明细 2023 年 12 月 18 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Qi-House Holdings?

关于Qi-House Holdings,缺乏机构所有权告诉我们什么?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我们倾向于看到机构投资者持有风险很高、交易量很少或规模很小的公司的股票。尽管我们有时确实会看到没有机构的大型公司在登记册,但这种情况并不特别常见。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Qi-House Holdings' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

没有机构拥有公司股份的原因可能多种多样。通常,小型的新上市公司不会引起基金经理的太多关注,因为大型基金经理不可能在公司中建立有意义的地位。另一方面,专业投资者总是有可能避开一家公司,因为他们认为这不是赚钱的最佳去处。Qi-House Holdings的收益和收入记录(见下文)可能不会吸引机构投资者,或者他们可能根本没有仔细研究该业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:8395 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 18th 2023
SEHK: 8395 2023年12月18日的收益和收入增长

Qi-House Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Tang Tong is the largest shareholder with 51% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. It's usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider with such skin in the game. Yang Songmei is the second largest shareholder owning 8.4% of common stock, and Mary Kathleen Babington holds about 3.8% of the company stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Mary Kathleen Babington is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

Qi-House Holdings不归对冲基金所有。该公司首席执行官唐通是最大股东,持有51%的已发行股份。凭借如此巨额的股份,我们推断他们对公司的未来拥有重大控制权。当内部人士拥有公司的大量股份时,这通常被认为是一个好兆头,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到一位拥有如此风险的公司内部人士。杨松梅是第二大股东,拥有8.4%的普通股,玛丽·凯瑟琳·巴宾顿持有该公司约3.8%的股份。有趣的是,第三大股东玛丽·凯瑟琳·巴宾顿也是董事会成员,这再次表明公司最大股东拥有强大的内部所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目标。据我们所知,分析师对该公司没有报道,因此它可能被忽视了。

Insider Ownership Of Qi-House Holdings

Qi-House Holdings的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难要求董事会对决策负责。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Qi-House Holdings Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. So they have a HK$1.1b stake in this HK$1.8b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

内部人士似乎拥有Qi-House Holdings Limited一半以上的股票。这赋予了他们很大的力量。因此,他们在这项18亿港元的业务中拥有11亿港元的股份。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望(免费)了解他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 36% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Qi-House Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有36%的所有权的公众,主要是个人投资者,对Qi-House Holdings有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Qi-House Holdings .

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该注意我们在Qi-House Holdings身上发现的两个警告信号。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

当然,这可能不是最值得购买的股票。因此,请看看这份有趣的公司的免费免费清单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发