share_log

Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688539) Touches CN¥5.8b Market Cap

Insiders With Their Considerable Ownership Were the Key Benefactors as NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688539) Touches CN¥5.8b Market Cap

随着南京国威科技股份有限公司(上海证券交易所代码:688539)市值触及58亿元人民币,拥有大量所有权的内部人士是主要的捐助者
Simply Wall St ·  2023/12/29 17:37

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in NanJing GOVA Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 4 shareholders own 55% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in NanJing GOVA Technology is 12%
  • 业内人士似乎对南京GOVA科技的增长有既得利益,从他们庞大的所有权来看
  • 前四名股东拥有公司55%的股份
  • 南京 GOVA 科技的机构所有权为 12%

Every investor in NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688539) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

南京国华科技股份有限公司(上海证券交易所股票代码:688539)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有58%所有权的个人内部人士。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥5.8b market cap following a 7.0% gain in the stock.

结果,内部人士上周得分最高,该公司的市值在股价上涨7.0%后达到58亿元人民币。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of NanJing GOVA Technology.

在下图中,我们放大了南京GOVA科技的不同所有权群体。

See our latest analysis for NanJing GOVA Technology

查看我们对南京 GOVA 科技的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688539 Ownership Breakdown December 29th 2023
SHSE: 688539 所有权明细 2023 年 12 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NanJing GOVA Technology?

关于南京GOVA科技,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据接近当地市场的指数来衡量其表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

NanJing GOVA Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of NanJing GOVA Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

南京GOVA科技已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看南京GOVA科技过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688539 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 29th 2023
SHSE: 688539 2023 年 12 月 29 日收益和收入增长

NanJing GOVA Technology is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Weiping Li, with ownership of 18%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 14% and 12% of the stock. Biao Huang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

南京GOVA科技不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是李卫平,所有权为18%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约14%和12%的股份。第三大股东黄彪也恰好拥有董事会成员的头衔。

On looking further, we found that 55% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

进一步观察,我们发现55%的股份由前四名股东持有。换句话说,这些股东在公司的决策中拥有有意义的发言权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解公众舆论也是有意义的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的空间。

Insider Ownership Of NanJing GOVA Technology

南京 GOVA 科技的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行董事会成员的情况并不少见,特别是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of NanJing GOVA Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own CN¥3.4b worth of shares in the CN¥5.8b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士拥有南京GOVA科技有限公司一半以上的股份。这使他们能够有效控制公司。这意味着他们拥有这家58亿元人民币公司价值34亿元的股份。这很有意义。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望(免费)了解他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in NanJing GOVA Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有南京GOVA科技28%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand NanJing GOVA Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - NanJing GOVA Technology has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,要更好地了解南京GOVA科技,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。以风险为例-南京GOVA科技有1个我们认为你应该注意的警告标志。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定该业务所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示分析师是否在预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发