share_log

HNA Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600751) Stock Price Dropped 6.1% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

HNA Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600751) Stock Price Dropped 6.1% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

海航科技股份有限公司, Ltd. 's(SHSE: 600751)上周股价下跌6.1%;个人投资者不会感到高兴
Simply Wall St ·  01/10 20:10

Key Insights

关键见解

  • HNA TechnologyLtd's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 45% of the business is held by the top 18 shareholders
  • 16% of HNA TechnologyLtd is held by Institutions
  • HNA TechnologyLtd拥有大量个人投资者,这表明关键决策受广大公众股东的影响
  • 45% 的业务由前 18 名股东持有
  • 海航科技有限公司16%的股份由机构持有

Every investor in HNA Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:600751) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 55% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

海航科技股份有限公司的每位投资者, Ltd.(上海证券交易所代码:600751)应该知道最强大的股东群体。持有公司股份最多的集团是个人投资者,准确地说约为55%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And following last week's 6.1% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.

继上周股价下跌6.1%之后,个人投资者遭受的损失最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of HNA TechnologyLtd.

在下图中,我们放大了海航科技有限公司的不同所有权组。

View our latest analysis for HNA TechnologyLtd

查看我们对海航科技有限公司的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600751 Ownership Breakdown January 11th 2024
SHSE: 600751 所有权明细 2024 年 1 月 11 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HNA TechnologyLtd?

关于海航科技股份有限公司,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据接近当地市场的指数来衡量其表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that HNA TechnologyLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see HNA TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,海航科技有限公司确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到海航科技有限公司的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600751 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 11th 2024
SHSE: 600751 2024 年 1 月 11 日收益和收入增长

HNA TechnologyLtd is not owned by hedge funds. CITIC Group Corporation is currently the largest shareholder, with 29% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 14% and 0.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

海航科技有限公司不归对冲基金所有。中信集团公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的29%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的14%和0.7%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 18 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我们的所有权数据时,我们发现18位最大股东共同拥有的股份登记册不到50%,这意味着没有一个人拥有多数股权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目标。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of HNA TechnologyLtd

海航科技有限公司的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.

我们的数据无法证实董事会成员个人持有股份。并非所有司法管辖区在披露内部人所有权方面都有相同的规则,我们可能在这里遗漏了一些东西。因此,您可以单击此处了解有关首席执行官的更多信息。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 55% of HNA TechnologyLtd. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有海航科技有限公司55%的股份。这种所有权水平赋予了广大公众的投资者一定的权力,可以影响董事会组成、高管薪酬和股息支付率等关键政策决策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 29%, of the HNA TechnologyLtd stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人公司似乎拥有海航科技有限公司29%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

虽然值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他更为重要的因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

许多人发现深入了解一家公司过去的表现很有用。您可以访问过去的收入、收入和现金流的详细图表。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更愿意去另一家公司看看,一家财务状况可能更好,那么千万不要错过这份由强劲财务数据支持的有趣公司的免费名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发