Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as MP Materials Corp.'s (NYSE:MP) Recent 11% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as MP Materials Corp.'s (NYSE:MP) Recent 11% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Key Insights
关键见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, MP Materials' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
- Insiders own 12% of MP Materials
- 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,MP Materials的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
- 51% 的业务由前 17 名股东持有
- 业内人士拥有 MP 材料 12% 的股份
Every investor in MP Materials Corp. (NYSE:MP) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 51% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
MP Materials Corp.(纽约证券交易所代码:MP)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。持有该公司股份最多的集团是机构,准确地说约为51%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。
And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$2.8b last week after a 11% drop in the share price. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 48% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell MP Materials which might hurt individual investors.
因此,上周该公司的市值在股价下跌11%后跌至28亿美元,因此机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。这组投资者可能特别担心当前的亏损,这加剧了股东一年的亏损48%。机构通常被称为 “市场推动者”,在影响任何股票的价格动态方面拥有强大的力量。因此,如果继续下跌,机构投资者可能会被迫出售MP Materials,这可能会伤害个人投资者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about MP Materials.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关MP Materials的哪些信息。
See our latest analysis for MP Materials
查看我们对 MP 材料的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MP Materials?
关于MP材料,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。
MP Materials already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of MP Materials, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
MP Materials已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下MP Materials过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in MP Materials. The company's CEO James Litinsky is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.5% by the third-largest shareholder.
由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对MP材料进行有意义的投资。该公司首席执行官詹姆斯·利廷斯基是最大股东,已发行股份的10%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约7.7%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有7.5%的所有权。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 17 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔细观察我们的所有权数据后发现,前17名股东的总所有权为51%,这意味着没有一个股东占多数。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解公众舆论也是有意义的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此您可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of MP Materials
MP 材料的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of MP Materials Corp.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$332m stake in this US$2.8b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有MP Materials Corp合理比例的股份。很有意思的是,内部人士在这项28亿美元的业务中拥有3.32亿美元的大量股份。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司29%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
Public companies currently own 7.7% of MP Materials stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
上市公司目前拥有MP材料公司7.7%的股份。这可能是战略利益,两家公司可能有相关的商业利益。可能是他们已经消失了。这一裁定可能值得进一步调查。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand MP Materials better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for MP Materials you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.
拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地理解 MP 材质,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。一个很好的例子:我们发现了 2 个你应该注意的 MP 材料警告标志,其中 1 个有点令人担忧。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是增长还是萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。