share_log

Private Companies Are Friend Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:605050) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥434m

Private Companies Are Friend Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:605050) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥434m

私营公司是朋友公司, Ltd. 's (SHSE: 605050) 最大的所有者,在市值下降4.34亿元人民币后受到打击
Simply Wall St ·  01/20 21:23

Key Insights

关键见解

  • FriendLtd's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • 32% of FriendLtd is held by insiders
  • FriendLt拥有大量私营公司所有权,这表明关键决策受到公众股东的影响
  • 51% 的业务由前 2 名股东持有
  • FriendLtd 32% 的股份由内部人士持有

A look at the shareholders of Friend Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:605050) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 39% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

来看看 Friend Co. 的股东, Ltd.(上海证券交易所代码:605050)可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,私营公司拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为39%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Following a 7.2% decrease in the stock price last week, private companies suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 32% stock also took a hit.

继上周股价下跌7.2%之后,私营公司遭受的损失最大,但拥有32%股票的内部人士也受到了打击。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of FriendLtd, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究FriendLtd的每种所有者。

View our latest analysis for FriendLtd

查看我们对 FriendLTD 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:605050 Ownership Breakdown January 21st 2024
SHSE: 605050 所有权明细 2024 年 1 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FriendLtd?

关于FriendLTD,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

Since institutions own only a small portion of FriendLtd, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

由于机构仅拥有FriendLtd的一小部分股份,因此许多机构可能没有花太多时间考虑该股。但很明显,有些人有;他们很喜欢它,足以买进。因此,如果公司本身能够随着时间的推移而有所改善,那么将来我们很可能会看到更多的机构买家。当一些大型机构想同时购买某只股票时,我们有时会看到股价上涨。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的历史可能有助于考虑是否会有更多的机构投资者想要这只股票。当然,还有很多其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:605050 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 21st 2024
SHSE: 605050 2024 年 1 月 21 日收益和收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in FriendLtd. Jianhua Cui is currently the company's largest shareholder with 26% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 25% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Jianbing Cui is the owner of 6.5% of the company's shares.

对冲基金在FriendLtd的股票不多。崔建华目前是公司的最大股东,已发行股份的26%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约25%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有9.1%的所有权。此外,首席执行官崔建兵持有公司6.5%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。

Insider Ownership Of FriendLtd

FriendLtd 的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Friend Co.,Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.8b stake in this CN¥5.6b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有Friend Co的大量股份。,有限公司。内部人士在这项56亿元的业务中持有18亿元人民币的股份。很高兴看到内部人士对这项业务进行如此投资。可能值得检查一下这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司24%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 39%, of the FriendLtd stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人公司似乎拥有FriendLtd股票39%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for FriendLtd (of which 1 is potentially serious!) you should know about.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。比如风险。每家公司都有,我们发现了 FriendLTD 的 2 个警告信号(其中 1 个可能很严重!)你应该知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发