share_log

Investors Three-year Losses Continue as CSC Financial (HKG:6066) Dips a Further 6.8% This Week, Earnings Continue to Decline

Investors Three-year Losses Continue as CSC Financial (HKG:6066) Dips a Further 6.8% This Week, Earnings Continue to Decline

由于CSC Financial(HKG: 6066)本周再下跌6.8%,收益继续下降,投资者连续三年亏损持续
Simply Wall St ·  01/23 18:18

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But in any portfolio, there are likely to be some stocks that fall short of that benchmark. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term CSC Financial Co., Ltd. (HKG:6066) shareholders, since the share price is down 52% in the last three years, falling well short of the market decline of around 36%. The more recent news is of little comfort, with the share price down 31% in a year. Furthermore, it's down 19% in about a quarter. That's not much fun for holders. However, one could argue that the price has been influenced by the general market, which is down 9.2% in the same timeframe.

为了证明选择个股的努力是合理的,值得努力超过市场指数基金的回报。但是在任何投资组合中,都可能有一些股票未达到该基准。不幸的是,CSC金融有限公司(HKG: 6066)的长期股东就是这种情况,因为股价在过去三年中下跌了52%,远低于市场约36%的跌幅。最近的消息并不令人欣慰,股价在一年内下跌了31%。此外,它在大约一个季度内下降了19%。对于持有者来说,这没什么好玩的。但是,有人可能会争辩说,价格受到了总体市场的影响,同期下跌了9.2%。

If the past week is anything to go by, investor sentiment for CSC Financial isn't positive, so let's see if there's a mismatch between fundamentals and the share price.

如果过去一周有意义的话,那么投资者对CSC Financial的情绪并不乐观,所以让我们看看基本面和股价之间是否存在不匹配的情况。

See our latest analysis for CSC Financial

查看我们对CSC Financial的最新分析

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多兹维尔的超级投资者 沃伦·巴菲特描述了股价如何并不总是合理地反映企业的价值。评估公司情绪变化的一种有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

CSC Financial saw its EPS decline at a compound rate of 12% per year, over the last three years. The share price decline of 22% is actually steeper than the EPS slippage. So it seems the market was too confident about the business, in the past. This increased caution is also evident in the rather low P/E ratio, which is sitting at 7.06.

在过去三年中,CSC Financial的每股收益以每年12%的复合速度下降。22%的股价下跌实际上比每股收益的下滑幅度更大。因此,过去市场似乎对该业务过于自信。这种更加谨慎的态度也体现在相当低的市盈率上,该比率为7.06。

The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下图描述了 EPS 随着时间的推移是如何变化的(点击图片可以看到确切的值)。

earnings-per-share-growth
SEHK:6066 Earnings Per Share Growth January 23rd 2024
SEHK: 6066 每股收益增长 2024 年 1 月 23 日

We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. Dive deeper into the earnings by checking this interactive graph of CSC Financial's earnings, revenue and cash flow.

我们很高兴地向大家报告,首席执行官的薪酬比资本相似公司的大多数首席执行官要低得多。始终值得关注首席执行官的薪酬,但更重要的问题是公司多年来是否会增加收益。查看这张CSC Financial收益、收入和现金流的交互式图表,深入了解收益。

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of CSC Financial, it has a TSR of -45% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是要考虑两者之间的区别 股东总回报 (TSR) 和 股价回报。股东总回报率是一种回报计算方法,它考虑了现金分红的价值(假设收到的任何股息都经过再投资)以及任何贴现资本筹集和分拆的计算价值。可以说,股东总回报率更全面地描述了股票产生的回报。就CSC Financial而言,其在过去三年的股东回报率为-45%。这超过了我们之前提到的其股价回报率。因此,该公司支付的股息提高了 股东回报。

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

While the broader market lost about 23% in the twelve months, CSC Financial shareholders did even worse, losing 28% (even including dividends). Having said that, it's inevitable that some stocks will be oversold in a falling market. The key is to keep your eyes on the fundamental developments. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 5%, each year, over five years. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand CSC Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with CSC Financial (including 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) .

尽管整个市场在十二个月中下跌了约23%,但CSC Financial的股东表现更糟,损失了28%(甚至包括股息)。话虽如此,在下跌的市场中,一些股票不可避免地会被超卖。关键是要密切关注基本发展。长期投资者不会那么沮丧,因为他们本可以在五年内每年赚5%。如果基本面数据继续显示长期可持续增长,那么当前的抛售可能是一个值得考虑的机会。长期跟踪股价表现总是很有意思的。但是,为了更好地了解CSC Financial,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,你应该了解我们在CSC Financial中发现的两个警告信号(包括一个让我们有点不舒服的警告信号)。

If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.

如果你想看看另一家公司——一家财务状况可能优异的公司——那么千万不要错过这份已经证明自己可以增加收益的公司的免费名单。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Hong Kong exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在香港交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发