ZJAMP Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002758) Stock Price Dropped 9.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
ZJAMP Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002758) Stock Price Dropped 9.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
Key Insights
关键见解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in ZJAMP Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 54% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 私营公司在ZJAMP集团拥有大量所有权,这表明他们在管理和业务战略方面集体拥有更大的发言权
- 54% 的业务由前三名股东持有
- 所有权研究与过去的表现数据相结合,可以帮助人们更好地了解股票的机会
A look at the shareholders of ZJAMP Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002758) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 54% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看ZJAMP集团有限公司(深圳证券交易所:002758)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。私营公司拥有54%的股份,拥有该公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As market cap fell to CN¥5.0b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
随着上周市值跌至50亿元人民币,私营公司面临的损失将超过该公司任何其他股东群体。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ZJAMP Group, beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下图开始,深入研究ZJAMP集团的每种所有者。
See our latest analysis for ZJAMP Group
查看我们对 ZJAMP 集团的最新分析
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZJAMP Group?
关于ZJAMP集团,缺乏机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
交易不太活跃的小公司通常缺少机构投资者,但是没有机构投资者的大公司并不常见。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. ZJAMP Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.
没有机构拥有公司股份的原因可能多种多样。通常,小型的新上市公司不会引起基金经理的太多关注,因为大型基金经理不可能在公司中建立有意义的地位。或者,该公司的某些方面可能使机构投资者望而却步。ZJAMP Group可能没有机构想要的那种过去的业绩,或者他们可能只是没有仔细研究该业务。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in ZJAMP Group. The company's largest shareholder is ZJAMP Holdings Group Co.,Ltd, with ownership of 30%. The second and third largest shareholders are Zhejiang Tai'antai Investment Consulting Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) and Zhejiang Xinghe Group Co., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 12%.
对冲基金在ZJAMP集团的股份不多。该公司的最大股东是ZJAMP Holdings Group Co., Ltd,拥有30%的所有权。第二和第三大股东是浙江泰安泰投资咨询合伙企业(有限合伙企业)和浙江兴和集团有限公司,持有与其同等数量的股份,为12%。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 54% stake.
对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,前三名股东通过其54%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of ZJAMP Group
ZJAMP 集团的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in ZJAMP Group Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.0b, and insiders have CN¥415m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的最新数据显示,内部人士拥有ZJAMP集团有限公司的部分股份。它的市值仅为50亿元人民币,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值4.15亿元人民币的股票。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但是可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in ZJAMP Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有ZJAMP集团37%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 54%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们的数据表明,私营公司持有公司54%的股份。私人公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而不是以个人身份对上市公司感兴趣。虽然很难得出任何广泛的中风结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with ZJAMP Group , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经向ZJAMP集团确定了3个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,来看看这份免费的有趣公司名单吧。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。