share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Harbour Centre Development Limited's (HKG:51) Recent 13% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Harbour Centre Development Limited's (HKG:51) Recent 13% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

由于海港中心发展有限公司(HKG: 51)最近下跌13%增加了一年的亏损,机构所有者可能会采取重大行动
Simply Wall St ·  01/26 18:09

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Harbour Centre Development's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The Wharf (Holdings) Limited owns 72% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,海港中心开发公司的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 九龙仓集团(控股)有限公司拥有该公司 72% 的股份
  • 使用公司过去业绩的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Harbour Centre Development Limited (HKG:51), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 72% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了海港中心发展有限公司(HKG: 51),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有72%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 13% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 17% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Harbour Centre Development, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

在上周公司股价下跌13%之后,机构投资者遭受的损失最大。毋庸置疑,最近的亏损进一步加剧了股东一年的17%亏损,下降幅度可能不大,尤其是对于这类股东而言。机构或 “流动性提供者” 控制着大量资金,因此,这些类型的投资者通常对股价走势有很大的影响力。因此,如果下跌趋势持续下去,机构可能会面临出售海港中心开发项目的压力,这可能会对个人投资者产生负面影响。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Harbour Centre Development.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关海港中心发展的哪些信息。

View our latest analysis for Harbour Centre Development

查看我们对海港中心发展的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:51 Ownership Breakdown January 26th 2024
SEHK: 51 所有权明细 2024 年 1 月 26 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Harbour Centre Development?

关于海港中心的发展,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Harbour Centre Development does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Harbour Centre Development, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,海港中心开发公司确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看海港中心发展过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:51 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 26th 2024
SEHK: 51 2024 年 1 月 26 日的收益和收入增长

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Harbour Centre Development is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Wharf (Holdings) Limited is the largest shareholder with 72% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. With 8.0% and 0.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Harson Investment Limited and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。海港中心开发项目不归对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,九龙仓集团(控股)有限公司是最大股东,已发行股份的72%。这意味着他们对公司的未来拥有多数权益控制权。哈森投资有限公司和Dimension Fund Advisors LP分别拥有8.0%和0.5%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Harbour Centre Development

海港中心开发项目的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Harbour Centre Development Limited. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It appears that the board holds about HK$55k worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of HK$4.3b. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有海港中心发展有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,他们可能会通过我们尚未采用的公司结构获得间接利益。看来董事会持有价值约5.5万港元的股票。相比之下,市值为43亿港元。我们通常希望看到董事会投入更多资金。但是,可能值得检查这些内部人士是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Harbour Centre Development. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有海港中心开发项目20%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 8.0%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们的数据显示,私人公司持有公司8.0%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Harbour Centre Development you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们发现了一个你应该注意的海港中心开发警告标志。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,来看看这份免费的有趣公司名单吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发