Estimating The Fair Value Of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:CELH)
Estimating The Fair Value Of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:CELH)
Key Insights
关键见解
- Using the 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity, Celsius Holdings fair value estimate is US$63.36
- Current share price of US$50.94 suggests Celsius Holdings is potentially trading close to its fair value
- Our fair value estimate is 8.8% lower than Celsius Holdings' analyst price target of US$69.45
- 使用两阶段的股本自由现金流,Celsius Holdings的公允价值估计为63.36美元
- 目前50.94美元的股价表明Celsius Holdings的交易价格可能接近其公允价值
- 我们的公允价值估计比摄氏控股的分析师目标股价69.45美元低8.8%
Does the January share price for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:CELH) reflect what it's really worth? Today, we will estimate the stock's intrinsic value by projecting its future cash flows and then discounting them to today's value. One way to achieve this is by employing the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Believe it or not, it's not too difficult to follow, as you'll see from our example!
Celsius Holdings, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:CELH)1月份的股价是否反映了其真正价值?今天,我们将通过预测股票的未来现金流来估算股票的内在价值,然后将其折现为今天的价值。实现这一目标的一种方法是使用折扣现金流(DCF)模型。信不信由你,这并不难理解,正如你将从我们的例子中看到的那样!
We generally believe that a company's value is the present value of all of the cash it will generate in the future. However, a DCF is just one valuation metric among many, and it is not without flaws. Anyone interested in learning a bit more about intrinsic value should have a read of the Simply Wall St analysis model.
我们普遍认为,公司的价值是其未来将产生的所有现金的现值。但是,差价合约只是众多估值指标中的一个,而且并非没有缺陷。任何有兴趣进一步了解内在价值的人都应该读一读 Simply Wall St 分析模型。
View our latest analysis for Celsius Holdings
查看我们对Celsius Holdings的最新分析
Is Celsius Holdings Fairly Valued?
Celsius Holdings 估值合理吗?
We use what is known as a 2-stage model, which simply means we have two different periods of growth rates for the company's cash flows. Generally the first stage is higher growth, and the second stage is a lower growth phase. To start off with, we need to estimate the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.
我们使用所谓的两阶段模型,这仅意味着公司的现金流有两个不同的增长期。通常,第一阶段是较高的增长阶段,第二阶段是较低的增长阶段。首先,我们需要估计未来十年的现金流。在可能的情况下,我们会使用分析师的估计值,但是当这些估计值不可用时,我们会从最新的估计值或报告的价值中推断出之前的自由现金流(FCF)。我们假设自由现金流萎缩的公司将减缓其萎缩速度,而自由现金流不断增长的公司在此期间的增长率将放缓。我们这样做是为了反映早期增长的放缓幅度往往比后来的几年更大。
Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we need to discount the sum of these future cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate:
通常,我们假设今天的一美元比未来一美元更有价值,因此我们需要对这些未来现金流的总和进行折价才能得出现值估计:
10-year free cash flow (FCF) estimate
10 年自由现金流 (FCF) 估计
2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 | 2032 | 2033 | |
Levered FCF ($, Millions) | US$171.1m | US$273.4m | US$337.0m | US$441.0m | US$535.0m | US$604.8m | US$664.0m | US$714.0m | US$756.4m | US$792.8m |
Growth Rate Estimate Source | Analyst x5 | Analyst x3 | Analyst x1 | Analyst x1 | Analyst x1 | Est @ 13.05% | Est @ 9.80% | Est @ 7.52% | Est @ 5.93% | Est @ 4.82% |
Present Value ($, Millions) Discounted @ 6.2% | US$161 | US$242 | US$281 | US$346 | US$396 | US$421 | US$435 | US$441 | US$439 | US$434 |
2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 | 2032 | 2033 | |
Levered FCF(美元,百万) | 1.711 亿美元 | 2.734 亿美元 | 337.0 亿美元 | 441.0 亿美元 | 5.350 亿美元 | 6.048 亿美元 | 6.640 亿美元 | 7.140 亿美元 | 756.4 亿美元 | 792.8 亿美元 |
增长率估算来源 | 分析师 x5 | 分析师 x3 | 分析师 x1 | 分析师 x1 | 分析师 x1 | 美国东部标准时间 @ 13.05% | 美国东部标准时间 @ 9.80% | 美国东部标准时间 @ 7.52% | Est @ 5.93% | Est @ 4.82% |
现值(美元,百万)折扣 @ 6.2% | 161 美元 | 242 美元 | 281 美元 | 346 美元 | 396 美元 | 421 美元 | 435 美元 | 441 美元 | 439 美元 | 434 美元 |
("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)
Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = US$3.6b
(“Est” = Simply Wall St估计的FCF增长率)
10年期现金流(PVCF)的现值 = 36亿美元
We now need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all the future cash flows after this ten year period. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of a country's GDP growth. In this case we have used the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield (2.2%) to estimate future growth. In the same way as with the 10-year 'growth' period, we discount future cash flows to today's value, using a cost of equity of 6.2%.
我们现在需要计算终端价值,它考虑了这十年之后的所有未来现金流。出于多种原因,使用了非常保守的增长率,不能超过一个国家的GDP增长率。在本例中,我们使用了10年期政府债券收益率的5年平均值(2.2%)来估计未来的增长。与10年 “增长” 期一样,我们使用6.2%的权益成本将未来的现金流折现为今天的价值。
Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2033 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = US$793m× (1 + 2.2%) ÷ (6.2%– 2.2%) = US$20b
终端价值 (TV) = FCF2033 × (1 + g) ÷ (r — g) = 7.93亿美元× (1 + 2.2%) ÷ (6.2% — 2.2%) = 200亿美元
Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= US$20b÷ ( 1 + 6.2%)10= US$11b
终端价值的现值 (PVTV) = 电视/ (1 + r)10= 200亿美元÷ (1 + 6.2%)10= 110 亿美元
The total value is the sum of cash flows for the next ten years plus the discounted terminal value, which results in the Total Equity Value, which in this case is US$15b. The last step is to then divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of US$50.9, the company appears about fair value at a 20% discount to where the stock price trades currently. The assumptions in any calculation have a big impact on the valuation, so it is better to view this as a rough estimate, not precise down to the last cent.
总价值是未来十年的现金流总额加上贴现的终端价值,由此得出总权益价值,在本例中为150亿美元。最后一步是将股票价值除以已发行股票的数量。相对于目前的50.9美元的股价,该公司的公允价值似乎比目前的股价折扣了20%。任何计算中的假设都会对估值产生重大影响,因此最好将其视为粗略的估计,而不是精确到最后一美分。
![dcf](https://newsfile.futunn.com/public/NN-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240131/0-291378cb12d082c45e3d6dea41a627d3-0-b51ccc9bc8327d9d8d497ab1475b187d.png/big)
The Assumptions
假设
Now the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate, and of course, the actual cash flows. If you don't agree with these result, have a go at the calculation yourself and play with the assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Celsius Holdings as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 6.2%, which is based on a levered beta of 0.800. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.
现在,贴现现金流的最重要输入是贴现率,当然还有实际现金流。如果你不同意这些结果,那就自己计算一下,试一试假设。DCF也没有考虑一个行业可能的周期性,也没有考虑公司未来的资本需求,因此它没有全面反映公司的潜在表现。鉴于我们将Celsius Holdings视为潜在股东,因此使用权益成本作为贴现率,而不是构成债务的资本成本(或加权平均资本成本,WACC)。在此计算中,我们使用了6.2%,这是基于0.800的杠杆贝塔值。Beta是衡量股票与整个市场相比波动性的指标。我们的测试版来自全球可比公司的行业平均贝塔值,设定在0.8到2.0之间,这是一个稳定的业务的合理范围。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
Valuation is only one side of the coin in terms of building your investment thesis, and it shouldn't be the only metric you look at when researching a company. The DCF model is not a perfect stock valuation tool. Rather it should be seen as a guide to "what assumptions need to be true for this stock to be under/overvalued?" If a company grows at a different rate, or if its cost of equity or risk free rate changes sharply, the output can look very different. For Celsius Holdings, we've put together three additional elements you should consider:
就建立投资论点而言,估值只是硬币的一面,它不应该是你在研究公司时唯一考虑的指标。DCF模型不是完美的股票估值工具。相反,它应该被视为 “需要哪些假设才能低估/高估这只股票的价值?” 的指南如果一家公司以不同的速度增长,或者其股本成本或无风险利率急剧变化,则产出可能会大不相同。对于 Celsius Holdings,我们汇总了你应该考虑的另外三个要素:
- Risks: Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Celsius Holdings (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
- Future Earnings: How does CELH's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart.
- Other Solid Businesses: Low debt, high returns on equity and good past performance are fundamental to a strong business. Why not explore our interactive list of stocks with solid business fundamentals to see if there are other companies you may not have considered!
- 风险:举例来说,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经向Celsius Holdings发现了两个警告信号(至少有一个不容忽视),了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。
- 未来收益:与同行和整个市场相比,CELH的增长率如何?通过与我们的免费分析师增长预期图表互动,深入了解未来几年的分析师共识数字。
- 其他稳健的业务:低债务、高股本回报率和良好的过去表现是强大业务的基础。为什么不浏览我们具有坚实业务基础的股票互动清单,看看是否还有其他你可能没有考虑过的公司!
PS. Simply Wall St updates its DCF calculation for every American stock every day, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any other stock just search here.
PS。Simply Wall St每天都会更新每只美国股票的差价合约计算结果,因此,如果您想找到任何其他股票的内在价值,请在此处搜索。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。